This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Coffee (talk | contribs) at 09:04, 30 May 2016 (Undid revision 721708169 by TakuyaMurata (talk) - This is LITERALLY THE ONLY VERSION OF THESE EDITS THAT EXISTS... You're being extremely disruptive.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 09:04, 30 May 2016 by Coffee (talk | contribs) (Undid revision 721708169 by TakuyaMurata (talk) - This is LITERALLY THE ONLY VERSION OF THESE EDITS THAT EXISTS... You're being extremely disruptive.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)In algebraic geometry, Chow's lemma, named after Wei-Liang Chow, roughly says that a proper morphism is fairly close to being a projective morphism. More precisely, a version of it states the following:
- If X is a scheme that is proper over a noetherian base S, then there exists a projective S-scheme X' and S-morphism such that is an isomorphism for some open dense subset U.
Proof
The proof here is a standard one (cf. EGA II, 5.6.1 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFEGA_II (help)).
It is easy to reduce to the case when X is irreducible. X is noetherian since it is of finite type over a noetherian base. Thus, we can find an open affine cover . are quasi-projective over S; there are open immersions over S into some projective S-schemes . Put . U is nonempty since X is irreducible. By the universal property of the fiber product we get
Let
is then an immersion. Let be the scheme-theoretic image of in . Let be the immersion followed by the projection. We claim is an isomorphism; for this, it is enough to show . But this means that is closed in . factorizes as . is projective over S; in particular, separated and so the graph morphism is a closed immersion. This proves our contention.
It remains to show is projective over S. Let be the immersion followed by the projection. We claim g is a closed immersion. This can be checked locally. Identifying with its image in we suppress from our notation. Let
where is the canonical projection. Then are an open cover of . Thus, it suffices to show for each i is a closed immersion. Let be the graph of . It is a closed subscheme of since is separated over S. Let be the projection. Then . But is the restriction of to and is closed. Hence, this says that is a closed immersion.
References
- Hartshorne, Ch II. Exercise 4.10 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFHartshorne (help)
- Since f is quasi-compact, its set-theoretic image is dense in its scheme-theoretic image. But since X is irreducible, two images must coincide.
- Grothendieck, Alexandre; Dieudonné, Jean (1961). "Éléments de géométrie algébrique: II. Étude globale élémentaire de quelques classes de morphismes". Publications Mathématiques de l'IHÉS. 8. doi:10.1007/bf02699291. MR 0217084.
- Hartshorne, Robin (1977), Algebraic Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 52, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-90244-9, MR 0463157
This geometry-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |