Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ian.thomson (talk | contribs) at 09:58, 5 June 2016 (→Blocked: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Amitashi reported by User:EvergreenFir (Result: ). Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:25, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. WCM_email 22:41, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Stop

It does not matter if you are "right" or not -- you need to discuss matters on article talk pages instead of edit warring.

If you revert at Ukraine again today, I will indefinitely block you. If you revert tomorrow or any other day without getting consensus at Talk:Ukraine first, I will indefinitely block you. Your only chance of appealing will be proving that you have read and understand WP:Edit warring. Simply saying "I know what I did wrong" will not be enough, I'll want you to summarize the policy in your own words and explain how you violated it. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:58, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Ian.thomson, As I said I will use talk page if I will face resistance. I see that you reverted even info on refugees that as you can see wasn't added by me. I consider this resistance so I will use talk page. And if I'll get consensus I will revert to my version.Amitashi (talk) 23:10, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

After you were unblocked, you started back up with the same behavior that got resistance before.

I reverted only the edit you made.

Again, you had resistance to the edits last time. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:12, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

To be clearer: this is what you added, this is what I reverted. I did not revert anything except what you added.

And leave messages on people's talk pages, not on their user pages. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:23, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Amitashi (talk) 23:33, 4 June 2016 (UTC):Ian.thomson, no you didn't. You didn't pay attention that information on refugees was in article before my very first edit on it! Here's proof: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Ukraine&oldid=723198908. It is version of June 1st while I entered June 2nd. So you violated my right to revert baseless info deletion by My very best wishes. This deletion wasn't even discussed at Talk page!

This is the exact action I took. You are completely wrong, and it is beside the point. The material was removed by Volunteer Marek and again by My very best wishes. To say that I removed it is wrong, and showing you this this evidence it would be a lie for you to ever again say that I removed it. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:56, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

--Amitashi (talk) 00:32, 5 June 2016 (UTC) It is clear that your action removed information that was in article before June 2nd. I don't ask you to excuse yourself. I will just suggest to revert that information at talk page.

I have presented you undeniable proof that it was not me. Your accusations are nothing but lies at this point. At this point you need to read WP:CIR and ask yourself if you should be here at all. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:41, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Amitashi (talk) 00:53, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Ian.thomson, I presented undeniable proof of your fault supported by links. You can't run from it. Reverting my edit you also reverted another person's work that I ABSOLUTELY legally reverted!

You showed that an older version of the article mentions refugees. I showed that the material was removed by Volunteer Marek and again by My very best wishes, and that I removed completely different material. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:07, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Seriously, check those links. Either you have not, or you are trolling at this point. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:10, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

@Amitashi. Are you saying that I reverted your edit? My very best wishes (talk) 03:43, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Amitashi (talk) 06:26, 5 June 2016 (UTC): Ian.thomson, man I don't try to put you to shame or something. I just point to the fact that your revert in terms of article completeness was actually deletion of two blocks of information, 10% of which is my small sentence, 90% is long lived and recently deleted info antecedent to my entrance that I suggested to revert! Simply hear SENSE of my words. It's not anout blaming, it is about drawing attention. This debate is contrproductive. I will suggest to revert refugees info at Ukraine talk page! I hope My very best wishes who made pretty same revert will understand and support.

Your recent editing history at War in Donbass shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:48, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Amitashi (talk) 08:56, 5 June 2016 (UTC):

Stop your propaganda pursuit Toddy1 (talk)!

Blocked