This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TheGRVOfLightning (talk | contribs) at 11:57, 15 June 2016 (→Air Crash Investigation: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:57, 15 June 2016 by TheGRVOfLightning (talk | contribs) (→Air Crash Investigation: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) CAN'T RETIRE WilliamJE tried to leave Misplaced Pages, but found that he couldn't do so…
Archives |
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 02:42, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Advice for the future: Don't accuse anyone of lying. It's usually pretty much impossible to prove intent, and it's probably uncivil and an AGF violation to boot. If you have evidence someone just said something untrue or without foundation, you can say that. It's not uncivil. And it usually makes it easier to find agreement and get back to improving the encyclopedia.--Elvey 08:35, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Elvey: I didn't accuse Nyttend of lying. I accused Nyttend of threatening to lie in order to get me blocked. Read the differential Nyttend even supplied.
- Here are links to the relevant exchanges by Nyttend and Orlady and then Nyttend's threat at the very top of to get me blocked for repeat harassment of him when in the words of the blocking admin and himself said it wasn't harassment and he backed her at the time.
- Do you know that Nyttend in his pursuit of me has gone to an Administrator's Misplaced Pages Commons talk page (Until this week when I uploaded a photo I've never edited at Commons) and used his backup account to contact an administrator. Use of backup accounts are acceptable, but Nyttend edited from his main account one minute after using his Nyttend account. WP:Scrutiny applies, read the one and only reason Nyttend says he'll use the backup for and compare it to his behavior, and I addressed this Acroterion at the time only to get rebuffed. Sphilbrick's reply to Nyttend at Commons is quite interesting. He rebuffs Nyttend, pretty much saying he is irrational, and that rather than a block I should be getting a Barnstar. If you defend Nyttend's use of his backup, it is hard to defend a charge of forum shopping against him because he went to Acroterion for the very same reasons Sphilbrick had already dismissed.
- Do you know I once tried to work with him on a article only to get rebuffed. Read this and this
- He's called me a stalker at least once in a edit summary.
- Nyttend has poked before. The original dispute that led to me being blocked which was overturned by Sphilbrick and which nobody defended the reasoning for, occurred Nyttend revived the topic after it had laid dormant for over a day. I'll supply the differentials if you really want to see it.
- Note I supply differentials all the time. Been to ANI before, from both sides of a dispute.
- Yesterday I saw both my physician about my malignant melanoma( I had a recurrence 6 months ago after 20 years of being clean. My talk page archives and user page have some mention of my melanoma history) and to see a person in regards to an offer I am being made for the rights to one of my ebooks I've written. Good stuff, not so good stuff, and I have things to do today too starting around 30 minutes from now that will keep me busy till afternoon Florida time....William, is the complaint department really on the roof?
Sorry, you're absolutely right - I accidentally misrepresented what you accused him of.I apologize forthe mistake andbringing up Nyttend on your talk page.--Elvey 08:16, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Air Crash Investigation
I have no idea as to why but that is what FOXTEL's title search indicated when I was checking for the episode airing on June 28, 2016. TheGRVOfLightning (talk) 11:57, 15 June 2016 (UTC)