This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 04:41, 9 August 2016 (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:PeterTheFourth/Archive 1) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:41, 9 August 2016 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:PeterTheFourth/Archive 1) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Hello! If there's any reason you'd like to contact me, feel equally free to leave me a comment here or wikimail me- I should be able to reply fairly quickly in either case.
 Archives | ||
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
List of reportedly haunted locations in Colombia
Thanks for your edits to List of reportedly haunted locations in Colombia. If you follow the edit history you'll see I have been trying to weed out non-reliable accounts and uncritical acceptance of the fringe view that real ghosts exist in all of these places, but another editor has been blind reverting me. Edward321 (talk) 00:20, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Ghostbusters
Not sure how to create a new section for Ghostbusters/July 2016, so I'll just use this one. The two sources given basically say "Critics give lots of legitimate reasons why they don't like the idea of the new Ghostbusters and think that it will suck, but we're pretty sure it's just because they hate women." I just wanted to discuss this with you before the GB article gets even more messy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MegaSolipsist (talk • contribs)
- @MegaSolipsist: To create a new section, either click the 'new section' button next to the 'edit' button, or tag it as such- == Section name ==. I think the best place to discuss your problem with the sources used for the statement (and your preferred alternative) is the talk page for the article. PeterTheFourth (talk) 00:53, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
AE request closed
I have closed an arbitration enforcement request that you filed regarding Ranze. The result is that no action was taken since the topic ban had expired before the edit in question was made. It should be noted that due to an error by the sanctioning administrator, you're not at fault for mistakenly believing that the ban was still in force. Seraphimblade 15:53, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Proposed lead section
It might be worthwhile self-reverting the Proposal #3 from the Gamergate article. It's clearly over the top and misaligned with previous statements on the matter that it's likely to be seen as disruptive. Your mileage may, however, vary. - Ryk72 22:04, 8 August 2016 (UTC)