This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ms Sarah Welch (talk | contribs) at 21:49, 9 August 2016 (→Re: your personal attacks and forum-y use of article talk page again: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:49, 9 August 2016 by Ms Sarah Welch (talk | contribs) (→Re: your personal attacks and forum-y use of article talk page again: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
|
Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Final warning
If you don't know what's an attack and what's a statement then you shouldn't be editing here. If this behavior continues then you will be blocked. —SpacemanSpiff 11:32, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- I will be glad for an example of what's an attack and what's a statement. Because if truly I have got that wrong, I will be the first person to apologize. So, can you show me where have I been wrong? --Mayasutra (talk) 11:48, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Mayasutra
- What Kautilya3 struck out is an attack, what you struck out are just simple statements. —SpacemanSpiff 11:49, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- I will be glad for an example of what's an attack and what's a statement. Because if truly I have got that wrong, I will be the first person to apologize. So, can you show me where have I been wrong? --Mayasutra (talk) 11:48, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Mayasutra
- I have been mentioning common consensus from several posts above the ones Kautilya struck out. So, why is Kautilya keen on the new ones mentioning that. Where have I attacked anyone by asking for common consensus and by mentioning Ms.Sarah Welch is not coming around to it. That is precisely the point I raised in Bishonen's page. Why there is no explanation for that there? What I stuck out are plainly attacks by Ms.Sarah Welch using aggressive language asking me to quit, quit, quit. Are words like "rat's ass" acceptable in wiki talk? Again, whenever have been wrong, have been the first person to come around and apologize. Ask Sitush. Here, the attacks came from Ms.Sarah Welch who first got personal without the need to do so.--Mayasutra (talk) 11:55, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Mayasutra
- I don't see Ms Sarah Welch asking you to quit editing. She was only asking you to quite making arguments based on WP:OR, as per policy. The "rat's ass" remark was a heated remark, I admit, but it wasn't directed at an editor. It is just an American expression to say "I don't care about XYZ." Your remarks that I have been striking are not especially bad, but your tendency to persist in making them is. I think you should listen to SpacemanSpiff and stop doing it. You might also take my advice to take some time off to cool off. - Kautilya3 (talk) 12:18, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- That's a very unfortunate suggestion Kautilya. Because when SpacemanSpiff reverted the edits, I did not touch them. Funny the way you too tend to sermonize. What is this about Sarah Welch -- See this content by the lady? Does it focus on the content (the excuse you use for striking off)? Did I say she asked me to quit editing? Please, again, you have not been reading well. Truly, my appreciation for Kashmiri has increased; after seeing what kind of tactics are used here. Surely, you have no right to strike out my appreciation for Kashmiri. In any case, if you want to take on the striking out route, you need to explain why there is no explanation on the common consensus issue? What was wrong in my comments on common consensus that required striking off? Shouldn't I be calling you a village pump for not keeping your word in letting me add sources (and content)? For not asking Sarah Welch why she is not coming around to consensus before reverting? Shoudn't I be calling Sarah Welch a village pump or worse for imagining things? There is no wish to continue here. But I certaintly want it known how admin function here. --Mayasutra (talk) 12:51, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Mayasutra
Re: your personal attacks and forum-y use of article talk page again
@Mayasutra: No incivility in wikipedia, please, with comments such as "You see Ms.Welch, you have a peculiar problem...." as you did here. You have been warned by @SpacemanSpiff, @RexxS, @Bishonen and others, in April 2016, for a similar behavior on Talk:Maya (illusion). Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 21:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)