Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Aubrey Wade - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SwisterTwister (talk | contribs) at 06:00, 10 October 2016 (C). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 06:00, 10 October 2016 by SwisterTwister (talk | contribs) (C)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Aubrey Wade

Aubrey Wade (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Extensive and specific PROD massremoved yet it had the exact and specified concerns in that there are no substantial claims of notability, there's no inherited notability from simply having some art appearances and features, and I noted I not only found nothing better, but that's because this career is not actually advanced yet to come close to it. SwisterTwister talk 05:34, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America 05:54, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America 05:54, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. North America 05:54, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America 05:54, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment – I deprodded the article, but it was not "massremoved". These WP:ASPERSIONS need to immediately stop, because they are uncivil in nature and suggest bad faith. My edits are educated, and are based upon source searches and other variables. For example, when I deprodded, I left the following rationale, "Subject has been featured in the British Journal of Photography per a preview page on the website, but cannot access the source. However, this suggests potential notability. Declined prod." (diff). Stop casting aspersions. North America 05:58, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment - I state the concerns because they apply considering the PROD remover has literally removed over 2 dozen of my PRODs today alone and within minutes of each other. Therefore it's relevant to state this is why we are therefore at AfD now. SwisterTwister talk 06:00, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Categories: