This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Scjessey (talk | contribs) at 20:33, 29 October 2016 (Final warning: Personal attack directed at a specific editor on User:Scjessey. using TW). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:33, 29 October 2016 by Scjessey (talk | contribs) (Final warning: Personal attack directed at a specific editor on User:Scjessey. using TW)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome!
Hello, 74tyhegf, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Misplaced Pages
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Misplaced Pages Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Misplaced Pages. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 01:22, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Misplaced Pages about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Robert Creamer (political consultant). Thank you. Drmies (talk) 03:26, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- 74tyheg, you can talk about "smokescreen" and "pussyfooting" all you want, but it's really quite simple: Misplaced Pages is based on reliable sources--and perhaps consider WP:AGF as well. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 17:11, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
October 2016
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Scjessey (talk) 14:35, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scjessey (talk) 20:29, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User:Scjessey. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Scjessey (talk) 20:33, 29 October 2016 (UTC)