This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Propol (talk | contribs) at 04:31, 16 September 2006 (→Image copyright problem with Image:Salvi Roskam Maher.png). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:31, 16 September 2006 by Propol (talk | contribs) (→Image copyright problem with Image:Salvi Roskam Maher.png)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Hi.
Welcome
|
roskam
Hi Propol,
I'm wondering why you oppose adding the Josh Marshall text to the Roskam article. Feel free to reply here — goethean ॐ 18:54, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Peter Roskam
I was asked, as I set out, in a bit more detail, at Talk:Peter Roskam, to act as an advocate for Joehazelton relative to the Roskam article, and I have attempted to delineate precisely those issues about which Joe is concerned and to frame several questions rather clearly in order that a focused discussion might be undertaken. On Joe's behalf, and in view of my appreciation for the advancement of the project, I'd ask that, at your leisure, you offer your views at the Roskam talk page. Thanks very kindly in advance! Joe 05:02, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- I posted a response at Talk:Peter Roskam. Thanks. Propol 18:08, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Your ANI posting
Propol, I've responded to your ANI posting. I hope both parties will be open to dispute resolution and that both of the articles will become balanced. — ERcheck (talk) 12:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reponse. I also provided an update there. Propol 15:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Moving this conversation from ANI to your talk page. On blogs — Can you verify that the Zorn blog does have editorial oversight/fact checking? While I do agree that a Chicago Tribune columnist is likely a reliable source, the distinction between blogs may be a difficult argument to make when you are trying to convince other editors. — ERcheck (talk) 16:30, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Propol, could you send your email address here? — goethean ॐ 20:51, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Salvi Roskam Maher.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Salvi Roskam Maher.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Misplaced Pages because of copyright law (see Misplaced Pages's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Misplaced Pages are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.
Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. rogerd 01:36, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- I posted a reponse on the talk page for image itself. I think there is a template already specified (newspapercover). It was used under fair use, with a copyright held by the Chicago Tribune. I also provided the orginal source link. Please help me retain this image. I have attempted to follow all of the rules. Am I missing something? Thanks. Propol 04:31, 16 September 2006 (UTC)