This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bishonen (talk | contribs) at 22:28, 26 February 2017 (arbitration enforcement sanction: topic ban). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:28, 26 February 2017 by Bishonen (talk | contribs) (arbitration enforcement sanction: topic ban)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Sock
This account appears to be a sock of CEngelbrecht. What's going on? Alexbrn (talk) 12:46, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
(Add) and are you also Aquapess? Alexbrn (talk) 08:38, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- No, I'm not Aquapess. If I just add a '2' to a dungeoned username, would I really be using other clandestine accounts? Fuck me, that there are more than one person out there thinking, that the waterside idea is being raped by Academia. What a world, what a world. CEngelbrecht2 (talk) 11:11, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Couldn't agree more, just because two people have a similar opinion about something, it doesnt mean they are being sock puppets!
- If you read carefully you can see that our tone and phrasing is completely different, but it seem clear to me that most things deemed pro-AAT are dismissed immediately without being actually read and considered logicallyAquapess (talk) 23:26, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Note
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 --NeilN 20:58, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Topic ban warning
What exactly is a "dungeoned" username, per above? It's not a word I understand, in the context of something that happens on a website. User:CEngelbrecht isn't in a dungeon in the sense of being blocked. Do you mean the older account has a fairly embarrassing history, which you wanted to have less visible? (I see I blocked it twice myself in 2013.) Anyway, I'm concerned by your contributions to Talk:Aquatic ape hypothesis under this account as well. I'll consider topic banning you from the article if you don't let up with the personal attacks, the relentless repetitiusness, and the nasty tone. Your talk of "raping the rules" and "being raped by academic stupidity" is offensive. So is aggressively calling people "darling" and groundlessly accusing them of bad-faith editing and "censorship". Don't call them "mate" or "lad" either. Those words might sound friendly in a totally different context, but in your hostile posts they sound more like you're condescending to inferiors. Do you see anybody else addressing you like that? Drop it. Bishonen | talk 18:35, 25 February 2017 (UTC).
- You ever tried being a Giordano Bruno? CEngelbrecht2 (talk) 19:48, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Couldn't log on to CEngelbrecht for years, untill I tried just now. I think somebody just unlocked it. CEngelbrecht2 (talk) 20:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Really? It was last blocked in September 2013, for one week only. See the block log here. You used it up to January 2014, see the contributions here. Would you like me to block it? That's a serious offer. I assume you don't intend to use both accounts — you'd be in trouble if you did — and CEngelbrecht2 is the most recent one, with a good long gap between them, so should preferably be used from now on. Bishonen | talk 21:44, 25 February 2017 (UTC).
- I'm serious, I haven't been able to log on to '1' before just now. Requesting a password sent to my mail address also came up empty. I tried all of that before I created '2' a week ago (in my indignation of another big round of vandalism against the aquatic article).
- But there's no point in having more than one, so go ahead and close '1'. (Can I then link my mail address to '2'?) CEngelbrecht2 (talk) 22:43, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- OK, I'll take care of it tomorrow. Sure you can have the same e-mail address, just add it in your preferences in the usual way. Bishonen | talk 23:27, 25 February 2017 (UTC).
- All right, cheers. CEngelbrecht2 (talk) 01:51, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- OK, I'll take care of it tomorrow. Sure you can have the same e-mail address, just add it in your preferences in the usual way. Bishonen | talk 23:27, 25 February 2017 (UTC).
- Really? It was last blocked in September 2013, for one week only. See the block log here. You used it up to January 2014, see the contributions here. Would you like me to block it? That's a serious offer. I assume you don't intend to use both accounts — you'd be in trouble if you did — and CEngelbrecht2 is the most recent one, with a good long gap between them, so should preferably be used from now on. Bishonen | talk 21:44, 25 February 2017 (UTC).
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
74.70.146.1 (talk) 13:17, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction
The following sanction now applies to you:
You have been topic banned for six months from Aquatic ape hypothesis and related pages, broadly construed. Please see WP:TBAN to see what "topic banned" means.
You have been sanctioned for persistent attacks and unremitting incivility while discussing the Aquatic ape hypothesis. Right after being warned about your tone, you post this on ANI. "Fondling ourselves at better peoples' expense"? That's the last straw. Apparently my warning made no impression on you at all.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | talk 22:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)