Misplaced Pages

User talk:Bokpasa

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by FayssalF (talk | contribs) at 00:03, 26 September 2006 (reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 00:03, 26 September 2006 by FayssalF (talk | contribs) (reply)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Edits

Hola Bokpasa! Espero que te sientes bien en Misplaced Pages. Your contributions are very welcomed and I appreciate many of them. However, I've been reverting some of your edits due to their innacurate facts! Please check before you change anything. I am not sure what's going on in the Spanish Misplaced Pages as I have no time to check stuff there but I'd appreciate if you edit carefully. Please feel free to contact me if you have any comment. Feliz año nuevo. Cheers -- Szvest 20:42, 31 December 2005 (UTC)  

Please stop changing all what is called a Dynasty to Sultanate! Szvest 20:48, 31 December 2005 (UTC)  

He eliminado un cambio que hizo en la página de Puerto Rico ya que lo expuesto por usted no es correcto. Cualquier duda me puede escribir. Vertical123

POV tagging

Hi again. Please, as a wiki policy, always discuss the issues (what is POV and why and how to remove it) before tagging an article. I believe this Misplaced Pages:NPOV tutorial#First: Negotiating neutrality with others means the same thing a esta política oficial en la version Española. Thanks in advance for discussing in the article talk page if you still have some issues so we can sort them out. Cheers -- Szvest 03:05, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Hispania

Could you please answer my question at Talk:Hispania#Sentence_fragment_cut? If it's easier for you to respond in Spanish, that's fine. -- Jmabel | Talk 05:47, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

History of Morocco

Could you please explain to us what this edit summary mean? -- Szvest 10:26, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Personal attack

I am amazed by you calling me Hitler!!! -- Szvest 11:54, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi Bokpasa, you are not a new user so you should be more than familiar with wikipedia rules (no tengo mucha experiencia con la es.wikipedia pero dudo que sean muy diferentes). Just a friendly reminder that this kind of language is completely unacceptable. Also be aware that simply because you do not agree with something (that is referenced and verifiable), that does not give you the right to remove it. Regards, E Asterion 20:22, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Se llama "redactar". Hay que hilar frases con su sujeto, verbo y complementos. Es lo que hay mayormente en las enciclopedias. --Ecemaml 17:45, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Blocked again for 1 week tendentious editing in Saadi Dynasty

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 1 week. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism. Szvest 13:31, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bokpasa (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This block is unjustified, is because he is extremist, and always like bloking me!!

Decline reason:

For the personal attack of calling another editor "an extremist", I would block you for about a week. So, if it helps, you can now consider yourself blocked for the rest of the time for disruption. ЯEDVERS 15:49, 13 September 2006 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bokpasa (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Further attacks

Decline reason:

No. pgk 18:22, 13 September 2006 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

but is thrue!, he always reverts my contribuition, because he is nacionalist morrocon, and he never mejorate my contributions or want to talk with me... he dont want know....

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bokpasa (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

(see below)

Decline reason:

You need to learn to work with other editors, not against them. This block has been reviewed and declined, please do not add the unblock template again. Thank you. JzG 18:27, 14 September 2006 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

He always reverts my opinion about the real history of Morrocco... he block me because i wrote ] (In a succession box, Turkey is also successor of Roman Empire....) , and I cant see personal attack!,, its false because acording international rulers country born in 1631, cant be sucessor another country disestablishments in 1659... what`s happent in 28 years are two dynasty?, or are two differents country, and one of them conquest the other?.....], ], ]

why cant can write the thrue?

ANI report

A report on your behaviour has just been filed to ANI by myself. Please have a look. -- Szvest 22:00, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Bokpasa. Tenemos dos cosas.
  • Edicion:
Necesitamos referencias y no aceptamos ideas y opiniones personales. Ya sabes muy bien que esto es una encyclopedia y no un forum. Si nos prometes que eso cambiara de vuestra parte, olvidaremos todo este jaleo y lo del ANI. No investigaciones originales y cita fuentes. Otra cosa que podies mejorar con el tiempo y que no es condicional en wikipedia es manual de estilo.
  • Comportamiento:
Necesitamos usarios que respetan las normas y leyes de wikipedia. Si nos prometes que este comportamiento cambiara immidiatamente, olvidaremos todo. No hagas ataques personales y presume buena fe-- Szvest 21:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC) User:FayssalF/Sign

Unprotected

Your user talk page is unprotected now. -- Szvest 15:10, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Vamos a ver

Bokpasa. He visto y leido el articulo 4dw.net. Que es el 4dw.net? Te habia commentado en la discusion en el Saadi que este sitio no es fiable (mira el articulo sobre China y Persia alli!). El sitio empieza la majestuosa historia China con la dinastia Manchu/Qing como nunca existia una dinastia Ming! El sitio empieza la majestuosa historia Persa con Cyrus II como nunca existia nadie antes! Es una tonteria!

Yo nunca y jamas he dicho que la historia de Marruecos nunca fue manipulada, por el istiqlal o por qualquiera. Es una cosa muy clara. Pero eso no significa en ningun momento que la historia de Marruecos comenzo con la dinastia Alaouita!

Una nacion/pais puede tener tantas dinastias gobernantes. Las dinastias van y vienen otras. Vienen republicas y van otras pero siempre queda el pais y los ciudadanos. Es verdad que existio la Republica de Bou Regreg. Nakur, Barghwata, etc... Pero todos forman parte de Marruecos como el Reino de Pamplona existio en la Historia de España, como la dinastia Ming existia en la Historia de China, como los Puritanos establician el Massachusetts Bay Colony. Como el Virreinato de Nueva España tenia a Tejas pero todo eso forma parte de EEUU que relativamente a todos los paises del mundo es un pais joven. No podemos empezar la historia de un pais de un punto definido si no es el punto mas antiguo y conozido. No olvides que Al-Maghreb como nombre existio desde los idrissides y no es una denominacion creada por las alaouitas. Si no fueron los Alaouitas, hubiera sido otra dinastia o bien una republica pero Al-Maghreb es la nacion.

A ver la Britannica como habla de Marruecos:

  • The Kingdom of Morocco is located at the western end of North Africa. Known to the Arabs as al-Maghreb al-Aqsa, or “the farthest west,” it was the center of Berber Islamic kingdoms that once included much of Spain and North Africa.britannica.com/Marruecos
  • The Marinids were a tribe of the Zanatah group—traditional allies of the Umayyad caliphs of Córdoba. The Marinids had been established in eastern Morocco for more than a century when. britannica.com/Marinid-Dynasty
  • The Almoravids took over Morocco and then the rest of the Maghrib following the decline of the Zirid dynasty. By 1082 they ruled Algiers. By 1110 they also controlled Muslim Spain, but the Christians began to win back territory in 1118. In the 1120s another Berber coalition, the Almohads, started a rebellion, eventually displacing the Almoravids.. britannica.com/Almoravid-dynasty.

Tienes que notar tambien que no se usa el termino de califato! Espero que estube muy claro como pienso que no se puede ser mas claro que eso. -- Szvest 00:03, 26 September 2006 (UTC) User:FayssalF/Sign