Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Chilicheese22 (talk | contribs) at 15:31, 4 July 2017 (→Please stop reverting Contraventum on their page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

— O Fortuna 11:57, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Congratulations

You're a trash human. Absolutely degenerate. Way to go wasting my precious time on complete nonsense - your disrespect is stomach churning. I might be going to puke in a bucket. I just thought you should know. You piece of filth. --ContraVentum (talk) 21:48, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Please stop reverting Contraventum on their page

Please don't make up policy, as in this edit summary. Users are entitled to remove posts from their page, and you're not allowed to put them back. See the exceptions here. There was no declined unblock request on the page. (P.S., if it was me, I'd remove the nasty post just above, but since you've been editing after it was posted, I assume you wish it to remain visible.) Bishonen | talk 14:27, 4 July 2017 (UTC).

@Bishonen: Appreciate you coming to me first before doing anything rash, the reason I left the message (on top of this one) was to show what kind of User ContraVentum is and to help the vote pass for an indefinite block. As you can see by admins looking at his talk page (His Clear Meltdown) they were able to see that he is obviously is not here to positively contribute. Nor has he shown the ability to work with others. Don't worry I won't be touching his TP.Chilicheese22 (talk) 15:03, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Er.. you're welcome. Did you blank my post by accident? (edit conflict: now restored by Bbb23) Just like Contraventum, you can remove what you like from your page, but it makes your reply to me completely mysterious to anybody who reads this page. That's only one reason why it's not the usual practice around here to blank and then reply. Bishonen | talk 15:14, 4 July 2017 (UTC).

Yeah that's my bad computer acting up today. Anyways I wanted to know if you had an idea of how many supporters my proposal would have to get for an indefinite block to be place, I currently have 4 in support of the idea (3 if you don't include me) and 0 opposing. Chilicheese22 (talk) 15:31, 4 July 2017 (UTC)