This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Indon (talk | contribs) at 13:05, 4 October 2006 (→Requested move). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:05, 4 October 2006 by Indon (talk | contribs) (→Requested move)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | Indonesia Stub‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Requested move
- oppose, too many other meanings. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 19:22, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
- support - Jambi Province is the primary meaning of the term. Other meanings can be found by the user on the disambiguation page. (MichaelJLowe 11:20, 26 September 2006 (UTC))
opposeSupport moving -I am afraid I have to oppose the idea, because I am a fan of Tool myself and they have a song called Jambi. There is also a city called Jambi. However,I do agree that Jambi (province) is the primary meaning, therefore it must not be on the disambiguation page. Imoeng 10:24, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- The disambiguation page is fine to cover the alternate meanings of Jambi. A song can't be compared in significance to the province containing 2.4 million people :-) (MichaelJLowe 11:41, 26 September 2006 (UTC))
- of course it can be _compared_. Maybe you look up the article comparison.
- Support — I think the name is primarily pointed to Jambi province. Though there is a song called Jambi or any other meanings, it can be linked via other disambiguation links from Jambi page, which is the province. — Indon (reply) — 10:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- It's not a question what YOU THINK. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 04:44, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Tobias, please respect the need for collaboration and consensus. Also, do not write posts like the one above that can appear "uncivil". --Merbabu 05:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Why is this uncivil? Indon wrote: "I think the name is primarily pointed to Jambi province." But this is of no big importance in a Misplaced Pages what one persons thinks. There should be provided objective facts. Thus I wrote: It's not a question what YOU THINK. . (...But a question of how it is) Tobias Conradi (Talk) 21:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Tobias, I think that is the difference between us. I think, but you don't. — Indon (reply) — 08:53, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- ~Indeed I think the same. And I think that there are more differences then only one between us. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 21:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- No. Since you don't think, the above sentence is not correct. — Indon (reply) — 13:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- Tobias, please respect the need for collaboration and consensus. Also, do not write posts like the one above that can appear "uncivil". --Merbabu 05:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- It's not a question what YOU THINK. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 04:44, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- support - i second the reasons put forward by michael, imoeng and indon --Merbabu 05:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Yath 13:39, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Support. *drew 14:36, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Moved to Vegaswikian 20:01, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
3RR
unsigned misinformation from User_talk:Tobias Conradi Tobias Conradi (Talk) 04:44, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
I see what you're doing with Jambi (province). Be careful, what you are doing is in violation of WP:3RR. Let the discussion on the talk page pan out before you start feeling justified in repeatedly reverting the edits made to Jambi.
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Tobias_Conradi&diff=78044114&oldid=78037422
- That was me who made that comment. You don't have to go off the handle because I forgot to sign my post. Simply use the {{unsigned}} template next time. WP:3RR does not say that it is okay to revert any article less than 3 times in a 24 hour period, and you were caught in an edit war over Jambi. I was perhaps hasty to say it was a violation of WP:3RR, but whatever it was, it was bad form. --King Bee 17:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Agree, it was bad form to put a false WP:3RR violation allegation on my page without providing evidence and without signing it. Hopefully you will do it better the next time. Thanks for the template pointer, I will use it next time. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 21:23, 3 October 2006 (UTC)