Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk | contribs) at 03:49, 15 August 2017 (Reverted edits by 172.58.136.232 (talk) to last version by NorthBySouthBaranof). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Lisa Murkowski

Breitbart is no less reputable than the New York Times (also referenced in the article) which itself has been recently plagued with numerous scandals of inaccurate and fake news. Furthermore, the quote within the article is sourced. Your only issue appears to be with the political affiliations of Breitbart. Please review WP:NPOV and WP:BALANCE for help understanding what we consider Neutral Point of View and maintaining the Balance of views presented in an article.

Well, no, that's simply not true. Breitbart is not accepted as a reliable source on Misplaced Pages because of its longstanding history of fabrications, lies and misrepresentations which are amply documented. If you have a question about this, please open a thread on the Reliable Sources Noticeboard. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 08:46, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Why?

😢--سرما(Talk) 04:53, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Linda Sarsour edit-warring

is not a revert. ZinedineZidane98 (talk) 22:39, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

The two edits combined are a revert, and in total, you have made four reverts in the last 24 hours. If you're unwilling to self-revert, I'll open a case on 3RRNB. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 22:54, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Google edit-warring

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Please discuss it on the talk page instead of edit-warring. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clown town (talk • contribs) 20:43, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

3RR

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Clown town (talk) 21:06, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Since you were warned and know the rules.