Misplaced Pages

User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Keith Johnston (talk | contribs) at 08:37, 19 August 2017 ({{subst:drn-notice}}: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 08:37, 19 August 2017 by Keith Johnston (talk | contribs) ({{subst:drn-notice}}: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Linda Sarsour edit-warring

is not a revert. ZinedineZidane98 (talk) 22:39, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

The two edits combined are a revert, and in total, you have made four reverts in the last 24 hours. If you're unwilling to self-revert, I'll open a case on 3RRNB. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 22:54, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Google edit-warring

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Please discuss it on the talk page instead of edit-warring. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clown town (talkcontribs) 20:43, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

3RR

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Clown town (talk) 21:06, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Since you were warned and know the rules.

Just letting you know that

There's an article in Breitbart "Misplaced Pages’s Left-Wing Editors Attempt to Minimize Evidence Supporting Google Memo" that mentions your user name as well as User:Jytdog and User:Nanite, purportedly written by User:The Devil's Advocate. I'm just letting you know that this has been published, but if there is anything I can do to help, e.g. if you view the article as harassment, please let me know.

Sincerely, Smallbones(smalltalk) 14:30, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

== Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! ==

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Keith Johnston (talk) 08:37, 19 August 2017 (UTC)