This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ed g2s (talk | contribs) at 14:53, 29 November 2004 (new votes from main page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:53, 29 November 2004 by Ed g2s (talk | contribs) (new votes from main page)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Ed Poor
Support
- Intelligent, dedicated, fairminded, diffident (sometimes slightly maddeningly so), a natural choice for arbitrator. Easy endorsement. -- Cecropia | explains it all ® 23:00, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support, an obvious choice. Fred Bauder 11:24, Nov 24, 2004 (UTC)
- Ed would make an excellent arbitator. He has my full support. Theresa Knott (Tart, knees hot) 11:28, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Perfect arbcomm material. Has all it takes. JFW | T@lk 17:42, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Strongly support. ] 22:11, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support. --Viriditas 10:22, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support. I completely disagree with Eds POV on most things, but there can be no doubt that he is one of the strongest fighters for NPOV. I also agree with him about temp bans, i think there should be far more of these. The bellman 11:29, 2004 Nov 27 (UTC)
- Support --Josiah 22:52, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Maybe the best example of a Wikipedian respected by users who otherwise disagree. Cribcage 17:48, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support Slim 12:38, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)