Misplaced Pages

Category:Administrators open to recall

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Centrx (talk | contribs) at 03:51, 16 October 2006 (Reverted edits by People Powered (talk) to last version by CmdrObot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 03:51, 16 October 2006 by Centrx (talk | contribs) (Reverted edits by People Powered (talk) to last version by CmdrObot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Shortcut
  • ]

Inclusion requirements

These administrators are willing to stand for re-confirmation of adminship if six editors in good standing request it.

Note:You should not add others to this category, it is a thing that should only be added by oneself.

Definitions

There is some dynamic tension between the goals of increased accountability and protecting the system from abuse. For that reason, "good standing" shall mean having over 500 mainspace edits and over one month of tenure unless the administrator in question has defined it differently.

Process

The desire is to keep this as simple as possible. Just ask, nicely, on the administrator's talk page, and if five others agree, it's done. The venue for "re-confirmation" shall be an open question, to be decided as required.

Participating admins may outline their understanding of this commitment and the procedure they intend to follow in more detail on their user pages.

Also, when you add yourself, you may want to consider piping the link in the category reference (for example ]) so that it sorts to your username and not to U for User... Just a thought.
There are no pages or files in this category.
This list may not reflect recent changes (learn more). Category:
Category:Administrators open to recall Add topic