This is an old revision of this page, as edited by General Ization (talk | contribs) at 22:59, 1 February 2018 (Warning: Three-revert rule on Milan Lucic. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:59, 1 February 2018 by General Ization (talk | contribs) (Warning: Three-revert rule on Milan Lucic. (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Diacritics
Please see Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Ice Hockey#Wikiproject notice. There is long-held established consensus that diacritics, with very limited exception, are not to be used on North American ice hockey articles. Maxim(talk) 22:20, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
February 2018
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:55, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Milan Lucic. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization 22:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Milan Lucic shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. General Ization 22:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)