Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ripapart

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SpacemanSpiff (talk | contribs) at 12:43, 3 March 2018 (→Final warning: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 12:43, 3 March 2018 by SpacemanSpiff (talk | contribs) (→Final warning: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Marriedwiki.com as a source

Hi Ripapart . I noticed that you used marriedwiki.com as a source for information in a biography article, Sarayu Rao . I cannot find any evidence or discussion that demonstrates marriedwiki.com meets reliable sourcing criteria, let alone the high standards required for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks.--Ronz (talk) 18:32, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

March 2018

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Veerapandiya Kattabomman shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 12:12, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

You have Edit warred more than I did.
  1. ]
  2. ]
  3. ]
  4. ]

Ripapart (talk) 12:34, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Final warning

You've been warned multiple times and you've been continuing the same disruptive behavior across anything you edit. You will be blocked if this continues. —SpacemanSpiff 12:43, 3 March 2018 (UTC)