This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BilCat (talk | contribs) at 18:37, 29 October 2006 (Comments). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:37, 29 October 2006 by BilCat (talk | contribs) (Comments)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)NOTE: Most comments will be deleted by me after one week. Critical comments are welcome, but ones containing highly-offensive or profane material will be deleted immediately, and the overall content ignored.
Also, if you are discussing an article, I would prefer to use that article's talk page. Please limit this page to discussions not related to any particular article, those covering a wide range of articles/topics, or personal comments. Thanks.
FN Charles de Gaulle
Looks like the discussion is running in circles. My primary concern is that the article gets 'locked-up' while we wait for Misplaced Pages's rules and policies on content submission to be enforced.
- Hey, to answer your inquiry in the talk page, yes the Journal of Electronic defense is an independent and very prestigious publication that comments on the joint Franco-American operation in its August 2002 article, "It Takes Two to Interoperate."UberCryxic 23:59, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi BillCJ, I removed your comment to Elaragirl on hte straw-poll section because I could not keep the counter working otherwise. Can you place your text elsewhere please. Sorry for editing you. :-) Natobxl 00:53, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey I just wanted to clarify something. Right now you have a vote under Keep and Neutral. Is there any particular stance that you prefer over the other? It might not be a good precedent to have votes under two different categories, though I'm not implying that it's against a strawpoll's rules or something. I just wanted to make sure. Thank you.UberCryxic 01:23, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey great idea! I like your compromise.UberCryxic 02:14, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey again, I don't want to feel like I'm chasing red herrings and make an idiot out of myself, so I decided to bring this up with you personally. I found another source. See this:
This fits with recent Pakistani reports that during June, French Rafale fighters and airborne control stations maintained combat air patrols across the probable path of fighters flying between Karachi and Mumbai – probably to stop surprise attacks on Indian nuclear facilities near Mumbai.
The Bharat Rakshak Monitor was "the first online journal dedicated to Indian military and strategic affairs." (see here)
Let me know what you think. Thanks.UberCryxic 02:25, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Do you think the source is good? And do you think the source satisfies some outstanding criteria? Once again, thank you.UberCryxic 02:26, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey. I appreciate your interest in the source, but I just wanted to clarify something: are you reading the whole thing? I just don't feel like that is necessary. That's the only part that refers to Rafales and the incident in question. I mean you're more than welcome to read the whole thing - maybe you'll pick up something I left out - but it seems the article overall is about Pakistani nuclear posturing post-Kargil, not this event per se.UberCryxic 02:58, 28 October 2006 (UTC)