This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Newimpartial (talk | contribs) at 15:35, 13 August 2018 (→Fantasy Imperium: Improper nom). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 15:35, 13 August 2018 by Newimpartial (talk | contribs) (→Fantasy Imperium: Improper nom)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Fantasy Imperium
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Fantasy Imperium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article has just passed the 13 year mark without a single source. A search on Google News, JSTOR, and newspapers.com fails to find any RS. WP:FANCRUFT applies. Chetsford (talk) 12:30, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 12:31, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Improper nom by clueless editor The nom apparently believes that tabletop roleplaying rules are "designed to be used for the play of a game exactly like Monopoly or Stratego" . Nobody who does not understand the text of a Misplaced Pages article in its plain meaning can legitimately nominate that article for deletion.
Nom doesn't even understand the FANCRUFT essay. That's pretty clueless. Newimpartial (talk) 15:35, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Categories: