This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MShabazz (talk | contribs) at 00:41, 15 August 2018 (→Harrassment: reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:41, 15 August 2018 by MShabazz (talk | contribs) (→Harrassment: reply)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) |
|
 Search the Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
July 2018
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the ] or ]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. Sandstein 09:07, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
The Signpost: 31 July 2018
- From the editor: If only if
- Discussion report: Wikipedias take action against EU copyright proposal, plus new user right proposals
- Featured content: Misplaced Pages's best content in images and prose
- Arbitration report: Status quo processes retained in two disputes
- Traffic report: Soccer, football, call it what you like – that and summer movies leave room for little else
- Technology report: New bots, new prefs
- Recent research: Different Wikipedias use different images; editing contests more successful than edit-a-thons
- Humour: It's all the same
- From the archives: The pending changes fiasco: how an attempt to answer one question turned into a quagmire
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Hey Malik. I hope, perhaps against hope, that you're doing well. Thank you for all you've done for our project: I hope you're not done yet, though it seems we regularly fail you. Drmies (talk) 17:39, 14 August 2018 (UTC) |
- Thank you for the kind words, Drmies, but nobody fails me. — MShabazz /Stalk 23:49, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Black Republican reference
We have attempted to add Chairman Sean P. Jackson to the list of Black Republicans and you continue to delete. We are respectfully requesting that you STOP or we will file a complaint and report you to Misplaced Pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sjacksonn01 (talk • contribs) 21:10, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- Sean, please do file a complaint. I look forward to your explanation of why you have been edit-warring for several years to include yourself in the list, when you are clearly not sufficiently notable to qualify for an encyclopedia article (and hence for inclusion in the list). — MShabazz /Stalk 00:14, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Harrassment
Whomever you are, we will file a formal complaint against your account if you continue to harass the work we've done to highlight Chairman Jackson! The Chairman is highly respected and we feel that you are attempting to silence a strong conservative voice! Please cease and desist immediately or we will pursue further action. Thank you
James Dobson (sjacksonn01) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sjacksonn01 (talk • contribs) 00:32, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- As I wrote above, I welcome your complaint. I look forward to your explanation of why you have been edit-warring and deleting relevant maintenance templates from the poorly sourced article you wrote. As has been explained to you many times over several years, your Chairman may be highly respected, but he fails the notability threshold to qualify for an encyclopedia article. — MShabazz /Stalk 00:41, 15 August 2018 (UTC)