This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fys (talk | contribs) at 17:17, 5 November 2006 (Three questions). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:17, 5 November 2006 by Fys (talk | contribs) (Three questions)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Please ask your questions here. Thanks! Nandesuka 14:56, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
A question I ask of randomly-selected candidates (although it was originally planned for all to answer):
- What is your opinion of ex-admins who have not voluntarily given up their sysophood? Do you think they should be resysopped at AC's will, or do you think that they should go through another RfA? What are your thoughts on the current re-adminship process for involuntarily-desysopped admins? – Chacor 15:03, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Questions from Newyorkbrad
Welcome to the race. My standard questions. Newyorkbrad 15:29, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
1. What can be done to reduce the delays in the arbitration process?
2. Would you anticipate participating in the actual writing of decisions. If so, do you have writing experience relevat to this task?
Questions from Fys
- I will be asking the same three questions to every candidate. 'Arbitration' is a process of dispute resolution. If the parties to an arbitration, after it has gone to the committee, manage to resolve the dispute or any part of it themselves, would you continue the case or that part of it? If so, why, and if not, why not? Fys. “Ta fys aym”. 17:17, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- What role do you believe private discussions between the parties and members of the committee should play in determining the outcome of Arbitration cases? Fys. “Ta fys aym”. 17:17, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Take a look at Misplaced Pages:Probation. Under what circumstances should users who have not had any restrictions on their editing imposed, be removed from probation? Fys. “Ta fys aym”. 17:17, 5 November 2006 (UTC)