Misplaced Pages

Draft:Operational Chow ring

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TakuyaMurata (talk | contribs) at 07:41, 9 September 2018 (Undid revision 858724104 by JJMC89 (talk) remove G13). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 07:41, 9 September 2018 by TakuyaMurata (talk | contribs) (Undid revision 858724104 by JJMC89 (talk) remove G13)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This page was nominated for deletion. The debate was closed on 9 March 2018 with a consensus to merge the content into the page Chow group. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the page for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use the destination page's talk page.

The basic question was whether there is a cycle map:

A ( X ) H ( X , Z ) . {\displaystyle A^{*}(X)\to \operatorname {H} ^{*}(X,\mathbb {Z} ).}

If X is smooth, such a map exists since A ( X ) {\displaystyle A^{*}(X)} is the usual Chow ring of X. (Totaro 2014) harv error: no target: CITEREFTotaro2014 (help) has shown that rationally there is no such a map with good properties even if X is a linear variety, roughly a variety admitting a cell decomposition. He also notes that Voevodsky’s motivic cohomology ring is "probably more useful " than the operational Chow ring for a singular scheme (§ 8 of loc. cit.)


References

Stub icon

This geometry-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.