Misplaced Pages

Gish gallop

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rich Farmbrough (talk | contribs) at 08:59, 16 September 2018 (→The '''Gish gallop''' is a technique used during [] that focuses on overwhelming an opponent with as many arguments as possible, without regard for accuracy or strength of the arguments. The term was coined by [] and named after the [] [], who used the technique frequently against proponents of evolution.<ref name="scott2004">{{harvnb|Scott|2004|p=23}}</ref><ref name="scott1994">{{harvnb|Scott|1994}}</ref>). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 08:59, 16 September 2018 by Rich Farmbrough (talk | contribs) (→The '''Gish gallop''' is a technique used during [] that focuses on overwhelming an opponent with as many arguments as possible, without regard for accuracy or strength of the arguments. The term was coined by [] and named after the [] [], who used the technique frequently against proponents of evolution.<ref name="scott2004">{{harvnb|Scott|2004|p=23}}</ref><ref name="scott1994">{{harvnb|Scott|1994}}</ref>)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The Gish gallop is a technique used during debating that focuses on overwhelming an opponent with as many arguments as possible, without regard for accuracy or strength of the arguments. The term was coined by Eugenie C. Scott and named after the creationist Duane T. Gish, who used the technique frequently against proponents of evolution.

Technique and counter measures

During a Gish gallop, a debater confronts an opponent with a rapid series of many specious arguments, half-truths, and misrepresentations in a short space of time, which makes it impossible for the opponent to refute all of them within the format of a formal debate. In practice, each point raised by the "Gish galloper" takes considerably more time to refute or fact-check than it did to state in the first place. The technique wastes an opponent's time and may cast doubt on the opponent's debating ability for an audience unfamiliar with the technique, especially if no independent fact-checking is involved or if the audience has limited knowledge of the topics.

Generally, it is more difficult to use the Gish gallop in a structured debate than in a free-form one. If a debater is familiar with an opponent who is known to use the Gish gallop, the technique may be countered by preempting and refuting the opponent's commonly used arguments first, before the opponent has an opportunity to launch into a Gish gallop.

See also

References

Notes

  1. Scott 2004, p. 23
  2. Scott 1994
  3. Logan 2000, p. 4
  4. Sonleitner 2004
  5. Hayward 2015, p. 67
  6. Grant 2011, p. 74
  7. Johnson 2017, p. 14-15
  8. Grant 2015, p. 55

Bibliography

Propaganda techniques
Categories: