This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ansell (talk | contribs) at 03:06, 8 November 2006 (→"bad faith" edits?: ... statements are personal attacks). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:06, 8 November 2006 by Ansell (talk | contribs) (→"bad faith" edits?: ... statements are personal attacks)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Australia national football (soccer) team
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--Panarjedde 02:06, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
"bad faith" edits?
Hi Kingjeff, I haven't had time to analyse every single change in this edit, but many of your changes, such as "campaigns" to "Campaigns", "Socceroos" to "socceroos", and "and" to "&" are incorrect so far as style goes. Most of the other changes appear to be simply line breaks in references, which don't make a difference to the page in general. I'm going to revert the edit back, but if you feel that any of the previous editors changes are "bad faith" or vandalism, please feel free to change just the specific parts of the article that you have a problem with. -- Chuq 02:49, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- Please do not make personal attacks by stating that edits are bad faith. Also, blanket reverts do not help. Ansell 03:06, 8 November 2006 (UTC)