This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Malik Shabazz (talk | contribs) at 20:19, 4 November 2018 (→Willis Towers Watson: reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:19, 4 November 2018 by Malik Shabazz (talk | contribs) (→Willis Towers Watson: reply)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) |
|
 Search the Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Misleading?
Why did you call this edit summary misleading? Debresser (talk) 17:53, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
As to the content of the edit, why do you say it is not supported by the "Languages" section? I do see Aramaic there, e.g. Debresser (talk) 17:54, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
- Please review all the changes made in that edit. If you still don't understand why the edit summary was misleading (a very polite description) and the changes were not supported by the article, you should read WP:CIR. — MShabazz /Stalk 21:33, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
- Perhaps you could simply answer the question? I don't find your reply very constructive. Debresser (talk) 18:42, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 October 2018
- From the editors: The Signpost is still afloat, just barely
- News and notes: WMF gets a million bucks
- In the media: Bans, celebs, and bias
- Discussion report: Mediation Committee and proposed deletion reform
- Traffic report: Unsurprisingly, sport leads the field – or the ring
- Technology report: Bots galore!
- Special report: NPP needs you
- Special report 2: Now Wikidata is six
- In focus: Alexa
- Gallery: Out of this world!
- Recent research: Wikimedia Commons worth $28.9 billion
- Humour: Talk page humour
- Opinion: Strickland incident
- From the archives: The Gardner Interview
Willis Towers Watson
What do you mean by "No articles about US corporations spell out "Corporation Incorporated" at the top of the infobox." I don't understand. I really really don't understand. Can you explain it in layman term please?
My argument:
- Willis Towers Watson is a company. Do you agree?
- Per SEC filings of 8K form on Nasdaq website, Willis Towers Watson's legal name is Willis Towers Watson based on (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) sentence under the mention of Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company on the first page. Should I provide the link?
- Name parameter of Template:Infobox company is legal name of the company. Have you ever read the documentation?
So, why my edit was reverted? I don't want to have edit war so I want to discuss it here. Thank you. MRFazry (talk) 15:55, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Addition: I became more confused after double-checked that the company is from UK, not US. MRFazry (talk) 15:59, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hi MRFazry. I'm sorry if my edit summary was unclear. Please read Public limited company, Corporation, and wikt:incorporated. Most public companies in the UK are public limited companies and most public companies in the US are incorporated as corporations. Just to pull two examples, Apple Inc. doesn't spell out "Apple Incorporated" at the top of its infobox, nor does Aon (company) spell out "Aon Public Limited Company" at the top of its. So I can't see any reason why Willis Towers Watson alone should spell out its name as "Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company" at the top of its infobox. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 20:19, 4 November 2018 (UTC)