Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jeh

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jeh (talk | contribs) at 16:54, 8 November 2018 (Following me?: yup! And I will now be on the lookout for similar edits from other usernames). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:54, 8 November 2018 by Jeh (talk | contribs) (Following me?: yup! And I will now be on the lookout for similar edits from other usernames)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jeh.
There is no Cabal
jeh
2718 dayssince a lost time incident on this page. (The previous record was 117 days.) Let's try to set a new record!



Archives (Index)



This page is archived by ClueBot III.


Discussions of article content belong on that article's talk page, not here! Please do not use this page to complain about, argue against, etc., my edits—not, at least on the basis of their content. You can of course thank me for them here if you want! But per WP:TALK, any discussion (argument, debate, dispute, whatever) over article content belongs on that article's talk page, not here. That way, other interested editors can see the discussion and participate. (Who knows? Consensus might go against me! But that can't happen if nobody else sees the discussion.) Thank you for understanding.
User talk
  • If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
  • If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
  • Please click here to leave me a new message.
If I've edited a page, or its talk page, I am either a) watching it or b) don't care about it any more.
So if you edit a page I've edited, or its talk page, a message here to go look there is either a) unnecessary or b) pointless. And clutters up the edit history here and requires deletion.
If you really want to make sure that I've been notified of something you've written elsewhere, please use the {{ping|jeh}} template there (or on its talk page if there isn't already a talk page). Thank you.

Following me?

You appear to be following me around Misplaced Pages as some sort of self-sanctioned police officer with a misplaced air of superiority. I think you really need to take a back seat and trying to halt the evolution of the encyclopedia with your 'views' which in many cases are nothing more than that. Looks like I'll need to use other accounts I've been using to prevent people with your level of sadness from doing what you do best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Volatileacid (talkcontribs) 15:47, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

To add, in your most recent revert, your justification is invalid. You can't interchangeably chop and change different types of terms in the same sentence where at one part you state a defined audio reference level, that is, line level, and then you compare it with other undefined 'strengths'. How are you easily supposed to understand where line level sits in relation to speaker, instrument and microphone levels? Why make life hard for the populace and restrain the dissemination of knowledge - christ get a grip. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Volatileacid (talkcontribs) 15:58, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Re the Line level article, I found your wording unencyclopedic and your addition in general unnecessary, so I reverted it. And yes, that's my opinion. A lot of edits are based on editors' opinions about wording, sentence structure, order of presentation, etc. That doesn't make them invalid.
Note that that was in the article lede; it is not necessary for the lede to explain everything completely - it is supposed to be a summary of what's in the article body. I'm not saying the original (which I didn't write, so you are off point when you refer to what "I state") was perfect, but yours added nothing to the reader's understanding. You're free to try again. I'll be free to revert or edit it, too.
"halt the evolution of the encyclopedia", "make life hard for the populace and restrain the dissemination of knowledge" - Haw! I'm completely unimpressed by such hyperbole and posturing. "Get a grip", indeed.
Re "Following" - Upon reverting certain types of mistakes, particularly those that indicate lack of competence (such as not understanding that we don't normally capitalize nouns that are neither proper names nor the first words of sentences, a rule that is not only covered in standard grade-school-level English but is also stated in our WP:MOS), a great many editors will check the "Contributions" of the reverted editor to see what else that person might have done along the same lines. That's part of collaboration here. Reverting such errors is not at all controversial, nor is using an editor's "Contributions" to find them.
Given your threat above, I should point out that there is a rule of "one person - one account", except for specifically allowed purposes such as tests (and in such cases you are supposed to document them as "belonging" to your main account on their user pages). You have just admitted that you edit from multiple accounts and will be using them to obfuscate your edit history. I must tell you that that is forbidden by WP policy (see WP:SOCK) and can result in blocks, even indefinite blocks for repeat offenders - no matter how valid are the edits performed. It is a persistent problem, and some editors have access to special tools to aid in detection of such "sockpuppets". Please don't contribute to the problem.
Oh heck, people have been blocked for persistently "bristling" when their edits are reverted. Such as you've done here. (I must mention that your attitude as expressed here does seem consistent with your username.) Misplaced Pages is edited collaboratively, and editing here means accepting that your contributions may be freely changed or deleted by other editors. That's life here. Jeh (talk) 16:54, 8 November 2018 (UTC)