Misplaced Pages

User talk:Malik Shabazz

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 03:04, 30 November 2018 (Archiving 3 discussion(s) to User talk:Malik Shabazz/Archive 68) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 03:04, 30 November 2018 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 3 discussion(s) to User talk:Malik Shabazz/Archive 68) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

User:Malik Shabazz/Tabs

User talk
  • If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
  • If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
  • Please click here to leave me a new message.

It is around 18:46 where this user lives.

Archiving icon
Search the Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present.

Cited Balance is not editorializing

Stop reversing changes that don't fit into your worldview.

Claiming consensus or mainstream association on something that isn't, is, in fact, editorializing at best, and lying at worst. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.58.207.34 (talk) 06:14, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

deleting talk page comments

you may wish to acquaint yourself with the rules on that issue: https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines. thanksHappy monsoon day 20:01, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, Happy monsoon day. You may wish to acquaint yourself with the policy WP:NOTFORUM and the guideline supplement WP:Competence is required, because your message ("It's OK to be White? that got enough attention to warrant similar treatment?") was incomprehensible and appeared to have no bearing on the subject of the article ("All Lives Matter"). Today you added, "there's no point!" So why waste both our time if there's no point? — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 23:34, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
duly chastened. I will attempt for higher levels of comprehensibility going forward. The only point I had to make was that the IOTBW page is suited to be linked to the ALM page and vice versa - and I did so. I shouldn't have even put a talk page comment there but sometimes things get touchy on these topics so wanted to try be helpful. In any case I have learned from this experience and I apologize for my churlishness.. Happy monsoon day 23:51, 28 November 2018 (UTC)