This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 03:15, 7 December 2018 (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Malik Shabazz/Archive 68) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:15, 7 December 2018 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Malik Shabazz/Archive 68) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
|
It is around 10:09 where this user lives.
Search the Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Your draft article, User:Beautystarr109/Gestation period
Hello, Malik Shabazz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gestation period".
In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 09:08, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hello DannyS712. Thank you for the notification, I suppose, but I didn't start any such draft. I don't remember it, but I may have edited it to remove or hide categories that are inappropriate for a userspace draft. — MShabazz /Stalk 12:53, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
1RR vio
00:43, 2 December 2018 and 13:02, 2 December 2018 (same content with sources) are 1RR violations. The article has been placed under ARBPIA at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration enforcement log/2017. Please self revert.Icewhiz (talk) 13:07, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards
Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Linda Sarsour
Read the talk page before removing material against WP:CONSENSUS. And please self-revert. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 04:06, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Wikieditor19920: Beginning with your very first edit to the talk page, you have continued to misrepresent Misplaced Pages policy, information pages, and the conduct of your fellow editors, including making unsubstantiated allegations of wrongdoing. If anyone has not been productive, it is yourself. So kindly refrain from tossing accusations around. You and Icewhiz can keep insisting that there's "consensus" in this discussion until you're blue in the face; the fact is that several policy-based objections have not been addressed, and so the requirements of Misplaced Pages:Consensus have not in fact been reached. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 10:37, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- Sangdeboeuf Kindly refrain from WP:STALKING me. 9 editors have contributed to the discussion on this. Of those 9, 7 (including myself) agreed the content was WP:DUE based on the sources provided. Only you and this user disagreed. Self-reverting would be the right thing to do. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 12:24, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- Wikieditor19920, read WP:Consensus before you lecture me about consensus, and read WP:BLP. — MShabazz /Stalk 14:00, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Wikieditor19920: are you for fucking real? You notified everyone on the article talk page about this request of yours. And you clearly have no idea what Misplaced Pages:Consensus actually means; it is not the result of a majority vote. You've miscounted the !votes to boot; Gandydancer, MShabazz and I all opposed inclusion, while Wumbolo's contributions were characteristically opaque. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 21:25, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- Sangdeboeuf Kindly refrain from WP:STALKING me. 9 editors have contributed to the discussion on this. Of those 9, 7 (including myself) agreed the content was WP:DUE based on the sources provided. Only you and this user disagreed. Self-reverting would be the right thing to do. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 12:24, 5 December 2018 (UTC)