This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Unbroken Chain (talk | contribs) at 18:22, 2 January 2019 (→AN notice (required notice)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:22, 2 January 2019 by Unbroken Chain (talk | contribs) (→AN notice (required notice))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Talk:U.S.-centric hypotheses about Nazi gun regulation listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect U.S.-centric hypotheses about Nazi gun regulation. Since you had some involvement with the Talk:U.S.-centric hypotheses about Nazi gun regulation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —GodsyCONT) 09:33, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gun show loophole
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gun show loophole you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gun show loophole
The article Gun show loophole you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gun show loophole for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:40, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gun show loophole
The article Gun show loophole you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Gun show loophole for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 00:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Arbitration CA notice
You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Amendment request: Lightbreather and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Misplaced Pages:Arbitration guide may be of use.
Thanks, Given the strong community sentiment that an exception be made to Eric Corebtt's topic ban to allow him to respond on-wiki to off-wiki criticism, I have proposed that a parallel exception be granted to allow you to respond to on-wiki criticisms and attacks. I believe that the disparate treatment of you in contrast to Corbett and a certain other user who I apparently may not name is at least arguably discriminatory. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 15:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- The amendment request has been archived at Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lightbreather#Amendment request: Lightbreather (October 2015). For the Arbitration Committee, Miniapolis 15:08, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
You're missed
I don't know exactly why you were banned, but you are missed here. You did more to improve articles on the gun debate in the U.S. than any other editor. Felsic2 (talk) 17:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Assault weapons legislation listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Assault weapons legislation. Since you had some involvement with the Assault weapons legislation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 14:52, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Private sale loophole listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Private sale loophole. Since you had some involvement with the Private sale loophole redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Hairy Dude (talk) 15:00, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
File:Everytown final logo.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Everytown final logo.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Flow 234 (Nina) talk 10:42, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Laura Fjeld for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laura Fjeld is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Laura Fjeld until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 04:16, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Amendment notice (required notice)
Please see ] Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:58, 2 January 2019 (UTC)