Misplaced Pages

Mountain Meadows Massacre

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Duke53 (talk | contribs) at 16:55, 16 November 2006 (revert). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:55, 16 November 2006 by Duke53 (talk | contribs) (revert)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Template:Totallydisputed

The Mountain Meadows massacre occurred on Friday, September 11, 1857 in Mountain Meadows, Utah, several miles south of Enterprise in Washington County along the portion of the Old Spanish Trail that became the overland wagon road to California. Mormon militia and possibly some of the Paiute Indian tribe killed an entire wagon train of Arkansas farming families known as the Baker/Fancher party, traveling from Arkansas to California. Around 120 unarmed men, women and children were killed. Seventeen younger children (none older than six) were kidnapped and cared for by local families. In the spring of 1859, the seventeen abducted orphans were rescued by the U. S. Army, and returned to their relatives in Arkansas.

Map showing the area around Mountain Meadows, highlighting the Spanish Trail

Siege on September 7–11 1857

The settlers were besieged for five days, beginning on Monday, September 7, 1857. Whether Mormons or Paiutes initially attacked the party on Monday is debated.

According to John D. Lee, on Friday morning, he went to the immigrants and convinced them to surrender their weapons and accept an armed one-on-one escort by the Mormon militia to safety from the siege, which the Mormon negotiators said was solely the doing of out-of-control Paiutes. Once the escort was underway in single file, a call of "Do your duty!" was given, whereupon all the adult men were shot. The women and older children were then killed by Indians and/or Mormons, depending on what source is to be believed. "Three children, one believed to be about 3 years old judging by tooth development, were killed by blunt-force trauma to the head." At least one Mormon man, who was traveling with the party through Utah, was killed in the incident.

The party's property was never fully accounted for, but it is widely believed to have been stolen by those who took part in the massacre.

The bodies were placed in both mass and individual graves, and in 1859 a detachment of U. S. Cavalry erected a rock cairn as a monument. On one stone were carved the words: "Here lie the bones of one hundred and twenty men, women and children, from Arkansas, murdered on the 10th day of September, 1857."

Lee was excommunicated from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints thirteen years after the incident. He was ultimately tried and executed for his crimes. He was the only person to be so punished. Lee admitted his reluctant complicity; in a lengthy confession given prior to his execution he said he was a scapegoat for the many Mormons, including leaders George A. Smith and Isaac C. Haight, responsible for the massacre. John D. Lee also spoke bitterly of LDS President Brigham Young before his execution. In the same confession, he said, "I have always believed, since that day, that General George A. Smith was then visiting Southern Utah to prepare the people for the work of exterminating Captain Fancher's train of emigrants, and I now believe that he was sent for that purpose by the direct command of Brigham Young." By other accounts, despite his ill feelings toward the Mormon leader, he maintained Young's innocence with respect to the massacre to his own grave.

On 1961-04-20, the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles authorized reinstating Lee's membership in the church and temple blessings. Lee's grandson Merrit L. Norton was baptized for his grandfather, and on May 9 Lee had his endowment and sealing ceremonies at the Salt Lake Temple, overseen by Ezra Taft Benson, an Apostle at that time.

Survivors

Template:Totallydisputed-section Seventeen young children were not murdered in the massacre. These children were distributed to local Mormon homes for care. All but one of the children were returned to their families in the east by the US Army.

An official report issued by Brevet Major Carleton, who was sent by the U.S Army to investigate the Mountain Meadows Massacre, stated that

Murders of the parents and despoilers of their property, these Mormons, rather these relentless, incarnate fiends, dared even to come forward and claim payment for having kept these little ones barely alive; these helpless orphans whom they themselves had already robbed of their natural protectors and support. Has there ever been an act which at all equaled this devilish hardihood in more than devilish effrontery? Never, but one; and even then the price was but '30 pieces of silver'.

Carleton goes on to give credit to Mrs. Hamblin for caring for the children, despite reports that members of her family had taken part in the massacre.

Mrs. Hamblin is a simple minded person of about 45, and evidently looks with the eyes of her husband at everything. She may really have been taught by the Mormons to believe it is no great sin to kill gentiles (the Latter-day Saint term for non-Saints) and enjoy their property. Of the shooting of the emigrants, which she had herself heard, and knew at the time what was going on, she seemed to speak without a shudder, or any very great feeling; but when she told of the 17 orphan children who were brought by such a crowd to her house of one small room there in the darkness of night, two of the children cruelly mangled and the most of them with their parents’ blood still wet upon their clothes, and all of them shrieking with terror and grief and anguish, her own mother heart was touched. She at least deserves kind consideration for her care and nourishment of the three sisters, and for all she did for the little girl, about one year old who had been shot through one of her arms, below the elbow, by a large ball, breaking both bones and cutting the arm half off.

James Lynch testified that "the children when we first saw them, were in a most wretched and deplorable condition; with little or no clothing, covered with filth and dirt. They presented a sight heart rending and miserable in the extreme."

However, Carlton's and Lynch's reports are contradicted by Dr. Forney's report to Congress. He said, "When I obtained the children they were in a better condition than children generally in the settlements in which they lived."

Disputed facts

Author Will Bagley wrote:

Reliable history requires accurate data. In the case of Mountain Meadows, we have a record irrevocably colored by dubious folklore and corrupted by perjury, false memory, and the destruction of key documents. Almost every acknowledged ‘fact’ about the fate of these murdered people is open to question.

The only survivors were young children. According to Bagley, "The reminiscent accounts of the surviving children, subtly shaded by the passage of time and the influence of questionable histories, are problematic, but they are surprisingly reliable and consistent." Accounts from the participants were given years later and are often contradictory and self-serving. Due to the cover-up, source documents disappeared. Although the various sources agree on the essential story of the massacre on September 11 1857, the sources differ on many of the facts leading up to or following the massacre. As a result, various historians have reached differing conclusions. This section reviews some of the controversies.

Who ordered the massacre?

Shortly before his execution, Major John D. Lee, the commanding officer at the scene, wrote the following in his last testament, The Life and Confessions of the Late Mormon Bishop, John D. Lee:

"I cannot go before the Judge of the quick and the dead with out first revealing all that I know, as to what was done, who ordered me to do what I did do, and the motives that led to the commission of that unnatural and bloody deed. The immediate orders for the killing of the emigrants came from those in authority at Cedar City. At the time of the massacre, I and those with me, acted by virtue of positive orders from Isaac C. Haight and his associates at Cedar City. Before I started on my mission to the Mountain Meadows, I was told by Isaac C. Haight that his orders to me were the result of full consultatation with Colonel William H. Dame and all in authority. It is a new thing to me, if the massacre was not decided on by the head men of the Church, and it is a new thing for Mormons to condemn those who committed the deed."

At the trial that resulted in his conviction, the witnesses said that Major Lee made the decisions that directly led to the massacre. Lee, however, said that he received orders from Lieutenant Colonel Isaac C. Haight, delivered by Major John M. Higbee, "to decoy the emigrants from their position, and kill all of them that could talk. This order was in writing." Bagley suggests that after a first trial of Lee resulted in a hung jury, the prosecutor may have struck an implicit agreement with the leaders of the church to allow Lee to be convicted at the second trial if charges against the other suspects would be dropped.

Affidavits taken from several participants after Lee’s trial also indicate that the orders to massacre the party came from Colonel William Dame, commander of the Iron County militia, and Lieutenant Colonel Isaac Haight, the militia’s second-in-command. Juanita Brooks notes that during the siege messengers made frequent trips between Mountain Meadows and militia headquarters in Cedar City and Parowan, providing ample opportunity for Dame and Haight to issue orders.

Researchers have disagreed on whether Young may have ordered the massacre. Brooks concludes that Young “did not order the massacre, and would have prevented it if he could.” Her conclusion is based largely on a letter from Young to Haight dated September 10 giving instructions to leave the emigrants alone. The key sentences from Young’s letter are the following:

In regard to the emigration trains passing through our settlements, we must not interfere with them until they are first notified to keep away. You must not meddle with them. The Indians we expect will do as they please but you should try and preserve good feelings with them. There are no other trains going south that I know of. If those that are there will leave, let them go in peace.

On September 7 Haight had sent an express rider, James Haslam, on the 496-mile round-trip journey to Salt Lake City; Young replied promptly and Haslam reached Cedar City with Young’s letter on September 13, two days too late to save the emigrants. Brooks, however, faults Young and George A. Smith for preaching militant sermons that set the conditions for the massacre and also for participating in the cover-up.

Bagley, on the other hand, concludes that Young was directly responsible for the massacre by encouraging the Paiutes to attack the party and seize their cattle. He cites a recently discovered journal recording a September 1 meeting of Young with the Southern Paiute chiefs, saying that Young “gave them” all the cattle on the southern route. He suggests that the statement in Young’s letter to Haight, “The Indians we expect will do as they please...”, carried a message that “the Mormons could blame whatever happened on the Paiutes.”

Bagley also quotes Lee’s Confessions, describing a late August conversation with George A. Smith, who was touring the settlements in southern Utah, in which Smith suggested that emigrant trains that made “threats against our people” should be attacked. According to legend, the execution command "Do your Duty!" was a direct quote from a communication from Brigham Young, ordering the massacre. Allegedly the message read, "Brethren do your duty." Many letters and documents were allegedly destroyed by the LDS church at the time, in fear of retaliation by the US Army.

Sally Denton, although agreeing with Bagley that Young was directly responsible for the massacre, disagrees regarding the role of the Paiutes in Young’s plans. She notes that the record of Young’s September 1 meeting with the Paiute chiefs indicates that they resisted Young’s efforts to enlist their support in the Utah War conflict. She also notes that it would have been nearly impossible for the chiefs to travel nearly 300 miles in 6 days to begin the attack on September 7. She views the account of Haslam’s ride and Young’s September 10 letter to Haight with considerable skepticism, considering these to be part of a plan to establish an alibi for Young.

Reasons for massacre

Brooks concluded in her book on the tragedy that,

The complete—the absolute—truth of the affair can probably never be evaluated by any human being; attempts to understand the forces which culminated in it and those which were set into motion by it are all very inadequate at best.

Brooks asserted that both historic events and emotional responses between Mormons and emigrants contributed to the tragedy.

Denton gives two reasons for the massacre; Annihilation and Plunder.

"The contention that the Mormons believed the train to be an advanced guard of the U.S. Army is ludicrous, given the numbers of women and children. It is certain that the Fancher-Baker party was lured under false pretenses and treachery to the remote ambush site of Mountain meadows for the purpose of annihilation and plunder; that the genocide was carried out as part of a military operation of a highly disciplined, rigidly hierarchical theocracy of a would-be nation state; and that it was never the independent initiative or act of renegade terrorists or Indians, as some Mormon advocates have said."

The massacre occurred in the context of a larger conflict between the LDS church and the United States. US troops were marching on the Utah Territory in the summer of 1857. Brigham Young, the federally appointed territorial governor, had not been informed by the President or government officials of the army's purpose. He believed this army could renew the violence the Latter-day Saints had experienced in New York, Ohio, Missouri, and Illinois prior to their arduous journey west. "We are invaded by a hostile force who are evidently assailing us to accomplish our overthrow and destruction," he declared August 5, 1857. In anticipation of an attack, he declared martial law in the territory and ordered "hat all the forces in said Territory hold themselves in readiness to March, at a moment's notice, to repel any and all such threatened invasion". Arrington, p. 254.

Rumors circulated in the region regarding the Fancher party. They were based on statements reportedly made by Fancher party members to non-Mormon traders along the Mormon Trail saying the party included members of the "Missouri Wildcats", the mob that killed Mormon founder Joseph Smith, Jr. In addition, some reportedly said they were present at the murder of Mormon Apostle Parley P. Pratt earlier that year. These statements have been called into question by various historians due to conflicting accounts of the settlers' journey south through Utah. But relations between Mormons and all non-Mormon emigrants were at best strained, in part because of tension caused by the anticipated war between Utah and the U.S. government. Also, the emotional legacy of the murders of Joseph Smith and others in Illinois in 1844, mob action in LDS settlements, and the Mormon War of 1838 in Missouri, in which Governor Lillburn Boggs had ordered all Mormons to be exterminated or driven from that state, led Mormon settlers to be antagonistic and on alert.

John Lee justified his actions in The Life and Confessions..., stating he was told by Isaac C. Haight, then President of that Stake of Zion:

(the emmigrants had) "violated the ordinances of the town of Cedar, and had, by armed force, resisted the officers who tried to arrest them for violating the law. That after leaving Cedar City the emigrants camped by the company, or cooperative field, just below Cedar City, and burned a large portion of the fencing, leaving the crops open to the large herds of stock in the surrounding country. Also that they had given poisoned meat to the Corn Creek tribe of Indians, which had killed several of them, and their Chief, Konosh, was on the trail of the emigrants, and would soon attack them. All of these things, and much more of a like kind, Haight told me as we lay in the dark at the old Iron Works. I believed all that he said, and, thinking that he had full right to do all that he wanted to do, I was easily induced to follow his instructions.

Haight said that unless something was done to prevent it, the emigrants would carry out their threats and rob every one of the outlying settlements in the South, and that the whole Mormon people were liable to be butchered by the troops that the emigrants would bring back with them from California. I was then told that the Council had held a meeting that day, to consider the matter, and that it was decided by the authorities to arm the Indians, give them provisions and ammunition, and send them after the emigrants, and have the Indians give them a brush, and if they killed part or all of them, so much the better.

I said, "Brother Haight, who is your authority for acting in this way?"

He replied, "It is the will of all in authority. The emigrants have no pass from any one to go through the country, and they are liable to be killed as common enemies, for the country is at war now. No man has a right to go through this country without a written pass."

We lay there and talked much of the night, and during that time Haight gave me very full instructions what to do, and how to proceed in the whole affair. He said he had consulted with Colonel Dame, and every one agreed to let the Indians use up the whole train if they could. Haight then said:

"I expect you to carry out your orders."

Some may have seen vengeance on the alleged murderers of Joseph Smith as a religious duty, for the following covenant had been added to the temple endowment following his martyrdom, where it remained until 1927:

You and each of you do covenant and promise that you will pray and never cease to pray to Almighty God to avenge the blood of the prophets upon this nation, and that you will teach the same to your children and to your children's children unto the third and fourth generation.

Memorial markers

The Mountain Meadows Massacre Monument in Carrollton, Arkansas.

In April 1859, the U.S.Army's First Dragoons of FT.Tejon, California under the command of Brevet Major James H. Carleton were ordered to Mountain meadows, Utah Territory by General Clarke, commanding the Department of California, to bury the bones of the American Massacre Victims who were murdered in September of 1857.

After their arrival, on the May 16 1859, the Dragoons reconnoitered the site and gathered the remains of thirty six victims within a two mile radius of the killing field and selected a burial site. Above the grave, a cairn was constructed of loose granite stones, hauled from the neighboring hills. At the precipice of the monument was placed a cross hewn from red cedar wood. On the traverse side of the twenty four foot North facing cross, an inscription was carved in the wood.

Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.

At the base of the monument, facing north, an engraved granite slab was placed with the words.

Here 120 men, women, and children were massacred in cold blood early in September, 1857. They were from Arkansas.

Brigham Young visited the memorial site on May 25 1861. After observing the above inscription on the cross Brooks quotes from a diary entry by Wilford Woodruff that Brigham Young said, "Vengeance is mine and I have taken a little." One of Young's escort lassoed the cross with a rope, turned his horse, and pulled it down. Brigham Young "didn't say another word," recalled Dudley Leavitt. "He didn't give an order. He just lifted his right arm to the square , and in five minutes there wasn't one stone left upon another. He didn't have to tell us what he wanted done. We understood." (Bigler; Forgotten Kingdom: The Mormon Theocracy in the American West 1847-1896, p. 178) However, Leavitt's story, which Brooks (p. 183) described as a "family legend," is contradicted by later travelers who refer to the monument as standing. Lorenzo Brown went past the monument in 1864, three years after Young's visit, and in his journal he describes seeing the intact cairn, cross, and inscription.

On September 15, 1990, a memorial marker was dedicated that lists the names of the 82 individuals who were killed and those of the seventeen children that survived. Those in attendance at this dedication were both members of the community and descendants of those killed and those that survived. It is maintained by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and the Mountain Meadows Association. The 1990 Monument stands on Dan Sill Hill, overlooking the site of the Massacre in the Mountain Meadows Valley below.

On September 11, 1999, church president Gordon B. Hinckley, in conjunction with the Mountain Meadows Association, dedicated a new Monument at the original Mountain Meadows gravesite. In 1859, two years after the Mountain Meadows Massacre, the original monument at this site was established by the U.S. Army. It consisted of a stone cairn topped with a cedar cross and a small granite marker set against the north side of the cairn and dated 20 May 1859. Military officials marked some other burial sites in the valley with simple stone cairns. The Utah Trails and Landmarks Association built a protective stone wall around the 1859 grave site in September 1932. In 1999, the 1932 wall was replaced, and the present Grave Site Memorial was installed. On August 3 1999, workers excavating for the wall around the new monument accidentally uncovered the 1859 Carleton grave. The governor of Utah at the time, Mike Leavitt, "encouraged state officials to quickly rebury the remains, even though the basic scientific analysis required by state law was unfinished. . . . The end result may be another sad chapter in the Massacre's legacy of bitterness, denial and suspicion". (Salt Lake Tribune, 03/12/00)" On September 10 1999, the remains recovered from that grave were re-interred in a burial vault inside the new wall, during a private ceremony. The monument was dedicated the following day, September 11 1999.

In 2004 city officials in Washington City, Utah rescinded an earlier decision to erect a statue honoring Lee. Descendants of the Fancher party, among others, strongly objected to any such statue. The sculptor of this statue ended up buying it back from the city.

An additional monument has been erected near Carrollton, Arkansas near the departure point of 33 members of the Arkansas Emigrant wagon trains. The monument is adjacent to a cemetery and the Carrollton Lodge. The monument includes a 2/3 replica of the rock cairn and the wooden cross that originally marked the mass grave has been erected, along with some other interpretive materials. It was erected by the Mountain Meadows Monument Foundation.

Mountain Meadows, Utah is on the national Historic Register.

Public perception in the nineteenth century

When the massacre became public in the decades after the incident, public outcry was widely heard. Mark Twain even gave an account, based on his perceptions about the attack, in appendix B of Roughing It, first published in 1872:

The leaders of the timely white "deliverers" were President Haight and Bishop John D. Lee, of the Mormon Church. Mr. Cradlebaugh, who served a term as a Federal Judge in Utah and afterward was sent to Congress from Nevada, tells in a speech delivered in Congress how these leaders next proceeded: "They professed to be on good terms with the Indians, and represented them as being very mad. They also proposed to intercede and settle the matter with the Indians. After several hours parley they, having (apparently) visited the Indians, gave the ultimatum of the savages; which was, that the emigrants should march out of their camp, leaving everything behind them, even their guns. It was promised by the Mormon bishops that they would bring a force and guard the emigrants back to the settlements. The terms were agreed to, the emigrants being desirous of saving the lives of their families. The Mormons retired, and subsequently appeared with thirty or forty armed men. The emigrants were marched out, the women and children in front and the men behind, the Mormon guard being in the rear. When they had marched in this way about a mile, at a given signal the slaughter commenced. The men were almost all shot down at the first fire from the guard. Two only escaped, who fled to the desert, and were followed one hundred and fifty miles before they were overtaken and slaughtered. The women and children ran on, two or three hundred yards further, when they were overtaken and with the aid of the Indians they were slaughtered. Seventeen individuals only, of all the emigrant party, were spared, and they were little children, the eldest of them being only seven years old. Thus, on the 10th day of September, 1857, was consummated one of the most cruel, cowardly and bloody murders known in our history.

Modern depictions in media

  • The play Fire In The Bones (1978) by Thomas F. Rogers is a depiction of the massacre from the perspective of John D. Lee, and is based heavily on Juanita Brooks' research.
  • The play Two-Headed (2000) by Julie Jensen depicts two middle-aged Latter Day Saint (Mormon) women reflecting on the massacre that occurred when they were children.
  • The film Burying the Past: Legacy of the Mountain Meadows Massacre (2004), directed by Brian F. Patrick, is a documentary of the event.
  • The film September Dawn (2006), directed by Christopher Cain, depicts a love story set at the time of the massacre.
  • the novel Red Water by Judith Freeman is a fictionalized account of John D. Lee's role in the massacre from the perspective of three of his nineteen wives.

Books and Articles

Notes

  1. Some feel Paiute Indians initiated the attack (perhaps with Mormon encouragement). Others believe that Indians were never involved, and that, from the beginning, the attackers were Mormons disguised as Indians. (Oral tradition among Paiute tribe holds that all its members refused the Mormons' request to participate. Other accounts, including Maj. Carleton's 1859 report presented before Congress and Lee's 1877 Confessions, assert Paiute involvement). Brevet Maj. Carleton of the US Cavalry made a report in 1859 that was submitted in the Congressional record in 1902, detailing his investigation; he noted the different accounts of the attack, including those holding the Indians solely responsible. His own conclusions were accounts that blamed only the Indians were extorted lies. While noting uncertainties, his conclusion held the Mormons and Brigham Young primarily responsible and advocated immediate action against them. He also showed a dislike of Mormons in general, stating the following:

    "The expenses of the army in Utah, past and to come (figure that), the massacre at the Mountain Meadows, the unnumbered other crimes, which have been and will yet be committed by this community, are but preliminary gusts of the whirlwind our Government has reaped and is yet to reap for the wind it had sowed in permitting the Mormons ever to gain foothold within our borders."
    — Maj. Carleton's report May 1859.

  2. Salt Lake Tribune, March 14 2000.
  3. John D. Lee (1877). Life and Confessions of John D. Lee, pp. 238-242.
  4. John D. Lee (1877). Life and Confessions of John D. Lee, pp. 225.
  5. Will Bagley (2002). Blood of the Prophets: Brigham Young and the Massacre at Mountain Meadows, pp. 311-319.
  6. Bagley, p. 361.
  7. Carleton,"SPECIAL REPORT OF THE MOUNTAIN MEADOW MASSACRE BY J. H. CARLETON, BREVET MAJOR; UNITED STATES ARMY,CAPTAIN, FIRST DRAGOONS"
  8. Brooks, Appendix XII, pp 279-284
  9. Senate record, 36th Congress
  10. Bagley, p. xvi.
  11. Bagley, p. xvi.
  12. Last Confession of John D. Lee, 233-234.
  13. The Mormons considered themselves at war during this period (see Utah War), and most of the men in the region held military ranks in local militias. George A. Smith was Brigadier General over all of Southern Utah as well as a member of the Quorum of Twelve Apostles. William H. Dame was Colonel of the Iron County militia as well as Bishop of the Parowan ward. Isaac C. Haight of Cedar City was Lieutenant Colonel of the Iron County militia as well as Parowan Stake President (over Dame in ecclesiastical matters, but under him in military rank). John M. Higbee of Cedar City was a Major in the Iron County militia, the ranking officer and field commander of the detachment at Mountain Meadows, as well as the first counselor to President Haight in the Parowan stake.
  14. *Juanita Brooks (1991). Mountain Meadows Massacre, pp. 194-198; Bagley, pp. 301-306.
  15. Lee repeats his report of the orders in the immediately following text. "Higbee handed it to me and I read it, and dropped it on the ground, saying, 'I cannot do this.' The substance of the orders were that the emigrants should be decoyed from their strong-hold, and all exterminated, so that no one would be left to tell the tale, and then the authorities could say it was done by the Indians." See Lee, Last Confession of John D. Lee, 233-234.
  16. Bagley, pp. 298-301.
  17. Brooks, pp. 84, 93.
  18. Brooks, pp. 72-73.
  19. Brooks, p. 219.
  20. The full letter is shown in Brooks, p. 63.
  21. Brooks, p. 219.
  22. Bagley, p. 379.
  23. Bagley p.114.
  24. Bagley, p. 137.
  25. Bagley, pp. 86-87.
  26. Bagley, p. xvi.
  27. Sally Denton (2003). American Massacre: The Tragedy at Mountain Meadows.
  28. Denton, pp. 158-159.
  29. Denton, pp. 157-158.
  30. Brooks, p. 223.
  31. Denton, p.153.
  32. Brooks, pp. 3-30.
  33. http://www.xmission.com/~country/reason/lee_mm.htm
  34. This version of the covenant came from the senate trial of Reed Smoot who was a Mormon Apostle who had been elected a Senator from Utah. In 1903, a protest was filed in the United States Senate to have Hon. Smoot removed from office, on the grounds that he had taken this treasonous oath in the endowment ritual. The content of the oath was revealed by former members of the LDS church. U.S. Senate Document 486 (59th Congress, 1st Session) Proceedings Before the Committee on Privileges and Elections of the United States Senate in the Matter of the Protests Against the Right of Hon. Reed Smoot, a Senator from the State of Utah, to hold his Seat. 4 vols. (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1906)
  35. Carleton,"SPECIAL REPORT OF THE MOUNTAIN MEADOW MASSACRE BY J. H. CARLETON, BREVET MAJOR; UNITED STATES ARMY,CAPTAIN, FIRST DRAGOONS".
  36. Desert News, 6/12/'61,
  37. Brooks, chapter 9, p. 182.
  38. Brooks, p. 183.
  39. Brooks was a lifelong Latter-day Saint raised in Saint George and a child of the Mountain Meadows Massacre generation.

External links

Categories: