Misplaced Pages

User talk:Hkelkar

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Shrilankabuddhist (talk | contribs) at 15:04, 17 November 2006 (vandalism). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:04, 17 November 2006 by Shrilankabuddhist (talk | contribs) (vandalism)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Archive

Archives


1 2 3 4 5 6

Things to do

The Misplaced Pages Neo-Buddhists

Get diffs of their inflammatory comments and submit them to Blnguyen on his talk page.Hkelkar 06:52, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Ambedkaritebuddhist:

  1. Summary .
  2. Massive disruption : (he's done this once before)

Nothing wrong here, but it's just plain hilarious (Babasaheb Ambedkar "taught us", apparently Ambedkaritebuddhist must be really really old to have been literally taught anything by Babasaheb :-)).

  1. Racist PA from Ambedkaritebuddhist

Dear Kelker, You are making fun of others You wrote: "Babasaheb Ambedkar "taught us", apparently Ambedkaritebuddhist must be really really old to have been literally taught anything by Babasaheb :-)". In my country we have Buddhist population as 0.8%. People who have migrated to America don't have much knowledge about my country. Hkelkar have mentioned once on your talk page regarding discussions 'Indian Jews' that your Father is Hindu and Mother is Jew. At least I accept the story and I really dont have any objections about your origin. I said if your school certificate shows you are a Jew then you are Jew otherwise Hindu. As always you reverted all the comments and discussions. Why do you hide discussions? I have also given the Vandalism Links but you are reverting them again and again. Will find more links wherever you have done vandalism. Now I am learning to work on Misplaced Pages. Have enough time to work. I am also happy to inform you that my grandchildren are helping me a lot. Take Care and carry your work dear.Ambedkaritebuddhist 11:16, 15 November 2006 (UTC)


Dhammafriend:

  1. Summary:

Bodhidhamma: TBC

Revisit old RFCU

Report Mujeerkhan's sock army to an admin.Hkelkar 06:52, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
  • > Please abstain from editing other's comments.Secondly, DO NOT call the serious issue of incivilty as "Ho Hum".—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ikonoblast (talkcontribs) .
He will once someone learns not to litter talk pages with bogus warnings.Bakaman Bakatalk 17:40, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
This should be my comment and not Ikonoblast - Pls. recheck "*> Please abstain from editing other's comments.Secondly, DO NOT call the serious issue of incivilty as "Ho Hum".—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ikonoblast (talkcontribs) ." MerryJ-Ho 13:52, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Your arbitration case

You should place your evidence on the Evidence subpage in the case. That is where you would place arguments in your defense, any explanation of your actions, diffs showing the bad behavior of others, and so on. Thatcher131 11:53, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

anon

ok, i'll see if he strikes again in those articles and revert his unsourced edits. tx Idleguy 14:53, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Your case

I provided some evidence. Will put in more as I find it. Nobleeagle 04:35, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Hkelkar arbitration case

May I suggest that you provide evidence on the evidence page? Descriptions of disruptive editing practices, supported by diffs, will be much more persuasive than unsupporteed accusations. You might want to look over the evidence pages in some prior cases to get an idea of how the process works. Thatcher131 14:13, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

I feel like this is the calm before the storm. Good luck on the arbitration case. Mujhe lagtahai keh tumhay zuroorat hogey. BhaiSaab 04:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Tit for tat eh? I guess that's a useful strategy, but your arguments aren't holding up. BhaiSaab 06:44, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Would you like to me to number my points so you don't have to requote them? BhaiSaab 06:46, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Re:Hi

Ay dude,

I'm sorry i'll not be able to come back before May. I'll be taking A Levels this year you see... So you r a Mumbaikar ha? My mum is from across the Bay, Alibag. Though my dad is a Sindhi-Rajput i identify with Marathis more coz i've grown up with my mother. Still my Marathi is far from perfect! Anyways do you know Alibag had highest percentage of Jews amongst its population until 1960's... One of my cousins is married to a Bene-Israeli. She stays in Ashdod. Neeways take care.

File:England flag large.png अमेय आर्यन DaBroodey 14:26, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Cheema

I agree, it's a bizarre article. Firstly all that discredited "Martial Race" stuff of which the author appears to approve, and then a very strange narrative based on a single source called the Chach-nama. Articles on castes and sub-castes are always a fruitful source of contention as there are many users who see them as a sort of private online genealogy and repository of cherished myths of origin. However, I find an article which goes on at so much length about how an early Muslim conqueror was a better ruler to the non-Muslims of Sindh and Punjab than the Hindu Rajas who "oppressed" them highly suspicious. If the Chach-nama is a valid source then it is clearly a hagiography which needs to be used with caution. It is also unlikely that the majority of the population of Punjab would have been Buddhist at that date. We should beware of using modern religious terms too freely when talking about such a distant period, but the heyday of Indian Buddhism was under the Mauryas five hundred years previously. It is much more likely that the people of Punjab (a large proportion of whom would have been nomadic then) followed various local deities which have subsequently been subsumed into Hinduism. I also have my doubts as to whether all Cheemas are now Muslims - most of the major Jat clans have representatives on both sides of the border, and are divided between Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs. I can't claim to be an expert on this period as it's really far too early, but I'll see what I can do. Sikandarji 18:40, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

The only history of the Jats the Bodleian has is by Kalikan Raja Qanungo and was published in Calcutta in 1925. I suppose I could have a look at that. Sikandarji 19:10, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

adab

See http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:India-Israel_relations#Islamic_Terrorism_.2F_Islamic_Militancy Mustaqbal 02:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

tipu sultan

dont vandalise!you said "India did not even exist at the time of Tipu", then how come india was called during 18th century other than hindustan or bharath. If you cant digest it then please dont blow it out! Mujeerkhan 04:43, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Dalit Voice

Sorry, I am pretty clueless in that area. I'd love to learn though. ←Humus sapiens 12:30, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Muslim Guild POV-pushers trying to get original article deleted to protect their POV Fork

Striver's POV-pushing cohort User:Burgas00 has, in a fit of his POV-pushing zeal, nominated Beit_Hanoun_November_2006_incident for deletion here. The cowardly bad faith POV-pusher wouldn't even sign his own name to the deletion request either. I thought you should be warned of this. RunedChozo 22:11, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

It is very incivil for you to remove my message from your page, especially without bothering to give a reply. RunedChozo 22:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Sorry that was a mistake. I was reverting vandalism by another user. Thanks for informing me.Hkelkar 22:25, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Quite all right, not a problem :) Striking out my earlier bit, since it was an honest mistake. RunedChozo 22:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Fixed your talk page

You might want to see this diff], my guess is it's related to your issues with the Neo-Buddhists. They vandalized your talk page with it from an anonymous IP address. RunedChozo 22:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks a bunch :). Hkelkar 22:44, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Dear all, where do you find neo-Buddhists? What is their population? Please also let me know. I want to write about them also. It will be a help from you people contribute to wikipedia. Please help. Ambedkaritebuddhist 11:21, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Suspect images

Hi!

A lot of images uploaded to the Mumbai page to you have suspect licenses.

  1. An image which is licensed under a cc-by-sa-2.5 licence must explicitly state the author's name, the source location and the page where the author has released it under the license.
  2. Although legally valid, it is best that you release a PD license under the same one rather than a cc-by-sa-2.5
  3. Please do not hotlink an image to the source. Always link to a webpage that contains the image.

Please rectify this by next week to prevent your images from being deleted. Thanks and regards, --Anon

Mum

Thank you for moving my userbox. While I write, can I point out that on your user page you describe some Wikipedians as "racists". Also on the page "Countering Systemic Bias in Religion" you referred to some users as "Islamofascists". You know, we should assume good faith of all our fellow editors, so these comments aren't appropriate. It isn't easy to get on with those who have an opposite point of view to our own, but it is essential to do so if the encyclopedia is to be improved. There is a page somewhere, can't find it right now, with "most pointless POV disputes". It is very funny and I would recommend it. Itsmejudith 00:50, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Assumptions of Bad Faith

Regarding my assumptions of bad faith, you should read #9. BhaiSaab 04:15, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

You can check all you want, Roy. BhaiSaab 04:49, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

You have to add your edits to the comments section; don't try to make it appear as if Fred put them there. BhaiSaab 05:19, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

I think BhaiSaab is correct...I think the assertion is supposed to be that of the asserter. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 05:35, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
you can make your own stronger version of the assertion. In many arbcom cases, there are series like : 1 month ban, 2 month ban, 1 year ban....etc, and you sign all the small ones up to the maximum that you want. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 05:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism

Hi, Kelkar why did u reverted the sourced contents on Indian Buddhist Movement? I put the link from our beloved and valuable Buddhist Channel. . Be a positive contributor. Shrilankabuddhist 15:04, 17 November 2006 (UTC)