Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Whedonette (talk | contribs) at 19:22, 22 November 2006 (→Removing Speedy Deletion Tags is Vandalism -- DO NOT DO IT AGAIN). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Listen: If you don't have anything important to tell me, DON"T WRITE ANYTHING. Thanks, answers to my questions, and your questions are okay by my book! Okay? Okay!--Suit-n-tie 04:18, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

• I'm not gonna answer all questions or comments...whatever. So, just a heads up if I never reply.
• DON"T VANDALIZE. Though, I believe you won't be doing that.
• Don't Criticize Anyone.
• Don't Criticize me.
• Personal Attacks are no nos. Basically the same as above.
• I'm Not Gonna Talk To Any Sockpuppets.
• When You Leave A Message, And I Don't Respond In A While, I'll Delete it, or something, Maybe I'll reply, don't count on it tho'!.
• I Swear, If Anyone Vandalizes This Page, I'll Go There And Smack Em Upside The Head.
• I Keep The Right To Delete Comments Whenever I Want. Just A Heads Up, If Your Comment Disappears!

Archives

1. August 2006 – October 2006
2. November 2006 – December 2006
3. January 2007 – February 2007
4. Failed Attempt At A Joke
5. Warnings I'll Recieve, and yeah.

eep!

Oig, Suit! Tumor! Take care of that, buddy... hope all goes well. If you need some words of courage or a slap to the head pat of support, I'm here! :-) — Editor at Large 04:08, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Slap to the head? That's happened what... 3 times so far? Well, thanks though.--SUIT 04:10, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

About the awards you gave out...

You gave me a Working Man's Barnstar not too long ago. Just thought you might want to know in case you want to add it to the list. Cheers, and good luck with that mono/tumor/throat infection...thing. // Sasuke-kun27 02:06, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Oh, right, I haven't been updating that, but I'll get to that.. Yeah, my life's kind of a mess tight now.--SUIT 02:08, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

I know how you feel (sort of...) But cheer up, man. It'll turn up great in the end, trust me. Hope you feel well soon. // Sasuke-kun27 02:12, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Well, thanks.--SUIT 02:28, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Carnage

I don't care about you doubts. You have no right to revert my edits, especially if you don't have proof. You don't know if I'm lying therefore, you can't revert my edit. By the way, I'm not lying. 205.132.83.29 06:19, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes, but how can we be sure you're not lying hmm? --SUIT 06:24, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Responding for Suit; it may not be nonsense, but it is Original Research, and prohibited by Misplaced Pages. Until there is a formal release made, we cannot post this. Sorry. DoomsDay349 06:22, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

User:SamRaimi reported to WP:AIV per WP:USERNAME. How do you feel about just yanking that trolling thread from Talk:Spider-Man 3? -- Jim Douglas _(contribs) 07:30, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

That's what I've been doing. Go ahead, it's just a load of nonsense.--SUIT 07:33, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Darn, you beat me to it. I was amusing myself composing an appropriate edit summary. User:SamRaimi is already blocked. -- Jim Douglas _(contribs) 07:36, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. I just don't have much to do... Well, sorry. Cheers,--SUIT 07:38, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Heh, good riddance to the nonsense. I should have just reverted it earlier, like you'd already done, instead of responding to it. -- Jim Douglas _(contribs) 07:42, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

A good sendoff

Hey Suit, your sendoff of the Coffee Lounge made me smile, it seems very appropriate. Thanks. :) -- Natalya 13:27, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Sure. I'm gonna miss that place...--SUIT 17:16, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your support!

A week ago I nominated myself, hoping to be able to help Misplaced Pages as an administrator as much as a WikiGnome. I am very glad many others shared my thoughts, including you. Thank you for your trust! Be sure I will use these tools to protect and prevent and not to harass or punish. Should you feel I am overreacting, pat me so that I can correct myself. Thanks again! ReyBrujo 20:49, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Finally an admin, eh? Cool.--SUIT 22:00, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ahlstrom

I wanted to let you know that I have expanded the Ahlstrom article. It is a pretty big company, and it is traded on the Helsinki stock exchange. Could you please take another look at the article? --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 04:45, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

RE: IP

Hey Suit, yeah don't worry about the IP adress, I got it coverd thanks for replying though. EagleEyes 13:29, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Jackie Chan

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:52, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Feel free to add a comment -- bulletproof 04:54, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

I don't have much to add. Now I just wait.--SUIT 04:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Bardock

Hey there, Super Atomic SUIT! Um, could you check out Talk:Bardock? I posted up a discussion but nobody has answered yet....maybe if you put up your opinion on the site, more will take a look at it and give their opinion. So, when you get the chance, visit the talk page. It's section is at the very bottom. There's a link to the site; see if it has good information. If not, can you find a link needed or something. Thanks! ----Power level(Dragon Ball)16:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

It'll work itself out, I don't wish to get involved.--SUIT 06:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Removing Speedy Deletion Tags is Vandalism -- DO NOT DO IT AGAIN

Removing a speedy deletion notice is vandalism. It's not your place to judge whether or not a speedy deletion notice is appropriate or not; it's the reviewing administrator. Do not do it again, or you may subject yourself to further penalties that relate to vandalism. The tag itself advises you on how to dispute a speedy deletion notice if you so desire. — Whedonette (ping) 18:29, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

I know all that, I just didn't think you knew what you were doing.--SUIT 18:30, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Assuming bad faith of your fellow editors (i.e., assuming they don't know what they're doing) isn't a valid excuse for committing vandalism. — Whedonette (ping) 18:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

I already said so: I know all the policies; I've been here a while. I know: Assume Good Faith, Vandalism, etc... Now please, are you finished?--SUIT 18:37, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Glad to hear it. Then start implementing those policies in your behavior as an editor. You didn't in this case; thus, the warning. Don't do it again. — Whedonette (ping) 18:39, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

I have been implementing those policies since August.--SUIT 18:41, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

You didn't in this case: you admittedly removed a speedy delete notice (WP:VAND|vandalism) and did it because you assumed a fellow editor didn't know what he was doing (WP:AGF violation). I really don't have the urge to discuss this with you any longer. So here's the official warning text for you from Template:drmspeedy ...

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.

... and I've left your talk page. — Whedonette (ping) 18:49, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Removing warnings from your talk page is also considered vandalism and can in many circumstances lead to blocks. You do not own your talk page — it belongs to the Misplaced Pages project as a means of contacting you. You can archive your current talk page as you see fit, but not outright blank sections — see Template:TestTemplates for warning messages relating to talk page blanking, for example. Feel free to inquire on this issue at the administrators' noticeboard if you do not believe me. Do not do it again. — Whedonette (ping) 18:58, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

For god's sake, I didn't remove all this it's in an archive. Will you please leave me alone now?--SUIT 19:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Your contribution history shows no sign of archiving it. When people speak of archiving talk pages, they are not speaking of a private archive accessible to only you; they are speaking of publicly accessible archives, in the sense of something akin to User_talk:SUIT/Archive 1. Further information at Misplaced Pages:How to archive a talk_page. — Whedonette (ping) 19:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

It's in the warnings archive. Why are you treating me like a new user? I'm not I've been here for a while now.--SUIT 19:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Here are all of the pages in your userspace. Here are all of the pages in your user talkspace. I see no "warnings archive." Again, I refer you to the link I posted above, regarding talk page archival policy. — Whedonette (ping) 19:09, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

If you're looking for a link to the archive, here it is. // Sasuke-kun27 19:10, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Why do you edit under more than one Misplaced Pages account? That's extremely frowned upon. "enerally considered uncool unless you have a good reason." — Jimbo Wales (Misplaced Pages founder) At the very least, you should be appropriately labeling each of your talk pages. — Whedonette (ping) 19:16, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

He had his name changed and didn't bother to move a few pages. Stop acting all high and mighty. You're trying to make yourself look better by finding small and pointless flaws about SUIT. It's really arrogant and annoying. Nemu 19:18, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Assume good faith, please. — Whedonette (ping) 19:22, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

An admin has removed my speedy delete tag — I disagree with their rationale, as speedy delete tags are perfectly acceptable for user pages (WP:CSD#User pages refers to "any user pages that are not speedy deletion candidates," implying that there are user pages that are speedy deletion candidates). Nominating it for WP:MFD would be in bad faith since it was so recently nominated, and survived the nom. — Whedonette (ping) 19:22, 22 November 2006 (UTC)