This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cullen328 (talk | contribs) at 05:24, 27 July 2019 (Why I blocked). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:24, 27 July 2019 by Cullen328 (talk | contribs) (Why I blocked)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
IntelligentName (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I do not believe that the blocking administrator has justified that I intentionally violated the BLP policy. My one and only edit on Joe Biden was in good faith and I did not revert it back in once it was removed. I was warned on my talk page following the edit and took the warning into account. However, more than a month after the warning I was blocked by an administrator for the edit that I was warned about. I find this highly inappropriate and would like to request an unblock. Thank you.Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=''I do not believe that the blocking administrator has justified that I intentionally violated the BLP policy. My one and only edit on ] was in good faith and I did not revert it back in once it was removed. I was warned on my talk page following the edit and took the warning into account. However, more than a month after the warning I was blocked by an administrator for the edit that I was warned about. I find this highly inappropriate and would like to request an unblock. Thank you.'' |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=''I do not believe that the blocking administrator has justified that I intentionally violated the BLP policy. My one and only edit on ] was in good faith and I did not revert it back in once it was removed. I was warned on my talk page following the edit and took the warning into account. However, more than a month after the warning I was blocked by an administrator for the edit that I was warned about. I find this highly inappropriate and would like to request an unblock. Thank you.'' |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=''I do not believe that the blocking administrator has justified that I intentionally violated the BLP policy. My one and only edit on ] was in good faith and I did not revert it back in once it was removed. I was warned on my talk page following the edit and took the warning into account. However, more than a month after the warning I was blocked by an administrator for the edit that I was warned about. I find this highly inappropriate and would like to request an unblock. Thank you.'' |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Hard to tell what's going on-- you've removed all of that content. Now we must dig through the dif's Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:03, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Yep. Pretty sure it was for like Kamala Harris. You removed the note you got about that. You should go back through the old revisions and reread anything pertinent. Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:10, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Dlohcierekim the blocking administrator stated it was for the Joe Biden edit. Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:IntelligentName&oldid=907902935 --IntelligentName (talk) 05:19, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- I blocked for a recent pattern of BLP-violating editing regarding two prominent Democratic Party presidential candidates, not for a single edit. I did mention the Biden BLP violation because it was so egregious, but the pattern of editing regarding Harris adds to the evidence of the problem, and caused me to block. Cullen Let's discuss it 05:23, 27 July 2019 (UTC)