This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 66.124.233.190 (talk) at 06:58, 4 January 2005. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:58, 4 January 2005 by 66.124.233.190 (talk)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)More External links
The comments on the Kuro5hin article have many additional/related links. See R.I.P. Gary Webb -- Unembedded Reporter, in particular BACKGROUND ON THE CIA-DRUG CONNECTION - haven't gone through these though. --L
A Mole in the Progressive Movement
I've been pondering about this piece since I heard the news of the death of Gary Webb. I had been following Gary Webb's Dark Alliance series with great interest, not because the US government's involvement in drugs was anything new to me, but simply because I was wondering how long it would be before the corporate media would descend upon Gary like a bunch of vultures and kill his story and his livelihood.
And it happened as I had expected. We are all aware how the corporate press isolated and dismembered Gary. By publishing the results of his painstaking research, Gary had sealed his fate and guaranteed that no mainstream outfit would ever allow him to do anything significant on their behalf.
Despite the fact that the US corporate media can deceive and tame large sectors of the population, there are many from the left, the right, and just plain old Americans who distrust them. Gary's final emaciation, however, had to come from someone with progressive credentials, and that honor was bestowed upon David Corn of the Nation Magazine who stepped in to strike the final blow. Corn, who had not spent a single hour of research on the subject, attacked Gary's report and claimed that Gary Webb "had overstate the case and had not proven his more cinematic allegations." Imagine this: a scandal of this magnitude is unfolding that exposes how American citizens are falling victims to the CIA's drug-running operations, and David Corn sees his patriotic duty to pinpoint how "the case is being overstated." Personally, if I ran across such an "overstated" and "flawed" report, I would hold the CIA and Los Angeles authorities responsible and demand real investigations, rather than wasting my time, pinpointing unspecified flaws and immeasurable overstatements.
Having been a reader of corn's material, I knew this was not the first time Corn had been stepping in to attack any serious challenge to the status quo, but I had to search around a little to refresh my memory.
Just recently, in an article in the Nation Magazine, David Corn had tried to discredit Greg Palast's (the award-winning investigative reporter - GregPalast.com) claims of fraud in the 2004 Presidential elections:
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20041129&s=corn
Greg Palast was accused of being a conspiracy-theory nut, and people like him were discredited as making accusations based on supposition ("Those who say yes--at this point--are relying more on supposition than evidence. They cite the exit polls to claim the vote count was falsified to benefit Bush"). And of course, Mr. Corn's interpretation of the facts presented by Greg Palast and others must be the only acceptable one to declare the elections - not fraudulent, but fraught with glitches here and there.
In November 2002, in the height of the Bush administration's intrigues against Iraq and the popular antiwar demonstrations, David Corn steps in to attack and discredit the organizers of these demonstrations (in practice lining up with the Bush regime). In an article in the LA Weekly, Corn accuses the International ANSWER organization (Act Now to Stop War & Racism) of being a front for the Worker's World Party:
http://www.commondreams.org/views02/1031-08.htm
"Many local offices for ANSWER’s protest were housed in WWP offices. Earlier this year, when ANSWER conducted a press briefing, at least five of the 13 speakers were WWP activists". David Corn, presumably understands enough math to calculate that the rest could have been members of church groups, union representatives, Palestinians, Iranians, ...
However, since in today's world, populations in their millions here and there, are accused of being "terrorists", obviously David Corn should have the right to call only a few millions of antiwar demonstrators dupes of the Workers World Party.
That's not all - in 2001, David Corn and Marc Cooper (another Nation "liberal") side with Pacifica Radio Network's rogue management in their attempts to clean the member radio stations of progressives, sell some stations, and basically dismantle the progressive network.
http://www.zmag.org/CrisesCurEvts/Pacifica/pacupdavis.htm
Later in 2002, David Corn steps in to discredit a fellow by the name of Michael Ruppert who claimed that the Bush administration had been warned in advance of 9/11 attacks. Despite the fact that I always marvel at the vastness of David Corn's areas of expertise (and intervention), I have to say Michael Ruppert's basic claims are common knowledge today and also made in other ways by FBI whistleblowers and others.
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/030402_cornreply.html
http://www.alternet.org/story/12536
http://www.davidcogswell.com/Political/CornCrusade.html
David Corn's response to all these accusations: conspiracy theory - it's simpler than thinking.
Reviewing all this material might make one think of a mole in the progressive population, but unfortunately, the problem of conformism goes beyond David Corns, Marc Coopers, and Christopher Hitchins (see http://slate.msn.com/id/2102723/) as individuals. From the positions these people are, as liberals or "progressives", they can influence others and lead them down the path of conformism, passivity, or false complacence.
Such complacence, today, is encouraging a section of America's so-called progressives to accept the Empire's brutal war against the third-world, the destruction, and re-colonization of these countries. Fear and ignorance forces them to buy into this fabricated "war on terror" and the militarization of the society, our minds and consciousness, for when we buy into this crusade, we have accepted the Empire.
Andres Kargar - January 2005 galileo19@hotmail.com