This is an old revision of this page, as edited by HiLo48 (talk | contribs) at 02:55, 17 September 2019 (→A waste of electrons: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:55, 17 September 2019 by HiLo48 (talk | contribs) (→A waste of electrons: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Leave a message
My nomination in INT section
Hi. I nominated my article in , in the news section, for first time. You mentioned your comment about my blurb and whole work and you were oppose totally. I want to say you that I used your helpfully comment and corrected some of my Article problems. I also suggested some new blurb. Please check them and reconsider about your comment, if it is possible. Thanks a lot.Forest90 (talk) 13:44, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you, Forest90. I initially marked my !vote as a "weak oppose" to indicate that I'd be willing to support it if my concerns were addressed, and I see that you've been working hard to address them. I'll strike my original !vote and leave a new one. :) Vanilla Wizard 💙 20:19, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
A waste of electrons
That was a completely pointless note you left on my Talk page about the thoughts I expressed at ITN. I am already well aware of the precious sensitivities of Admins towards any criticism. The management of that page is appalling. It's one of the places where Misplaced Pages's biases are constantly on full display. As I said there, I only use it to promote important items from my culture, one that is obviously well outside the areas of interest of any of the Admins there, and which need pushing bloody hard to ever get posted in a timely manner, if at all. My actions achieved my goal. I am happy. I don't really care what the Admins there think, and your note simply reinforced my negative views. HiLo48 (talk) 02:55, 17 September 2019 (UTC)