Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by El C (talk | contribs) at 15:22, 25 September 2019 (Protected "Draft:Operational Chow ring": Edit warring / content dispute ( (expires 15:22, 2 October 2019 (UTC)) (expires 15:22, 2 October 2019 (UTC)))). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This page was nominated for deletion. The debate was closed on 9 March 2018 with a consensus to merge the content into the page Chow group. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the page for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use the destination page's talk page.

The basic question was whether there is a cycle map:

${\displaystyle A^{*}(X)\to \operatorname {H} ^{*}(X,\mathbb {Z} ).}$

If X is smooth, such a map exists since ${\displaystyle A^{*}(X)}$ is the usual Chow ring of X. (Totaro 2014) harv error: no target: CITEREFTotaro2014 (help) has shown that rationally there is no such a map with good properties even if X is a linear variety, roughly a variety admitting a cell decomposition. He also notes that Voevodsky’s motivic cohomology ring is "probably more useful " than the operational Chow ring for a singular scheme (§ 8 of loc. cit.)

References

• W. Fulton, R. MacPherson, F. Sottile, and B. Sturmfels, ‘Intersection theory on spherical varieties’, J. Alg. Geom. 4 (1995), 181–193.
• Totaro, Chow groups, Chow cohomology and linear varieties

This geometry-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

• v
• t
• e