Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ArmstrongLawyer (talk | contribs) at 17:25, 3 October 2019. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:46, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Assisted Death in the United States

An article that you have been involved in editing—Assisted Death in the United States—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. 8==8 Boneso (talk) 08:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Suicide bag

I have trouble with this edit, but I think we have an 1RR-restriction there. Could you please take a look? The Banner talk 17:34, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Your input would be helpful

Hi Ratel,

I mentioned you in the talk page of the CPPS article and requested your input.

Thanks, Thomas pow s (talk) 22:51, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Desmogblog-logo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Desmogblog-logo.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Rowingbohe♬(Talk/zhwiki) 08:36, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Desmogblog-logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Desmogblog-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Adolph Jentsch

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.adolphjentsch.com/ajlevinson.html, which is not released under a compatible license. I viewed the page in cached version; it's also visible in an archived version. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Misplaced Pages's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, most of your addition had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:29, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

I have answered on your talk page. Ratel (talk) 23:38, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Your write up ArmstrongLawyer (talk) 17:25, 3 October 2019 (UTC)of Martin Armstrong continues to mischaracterize what really happened in this case. Instead of obtaining the real and accurate facts, you cite to news articles written for sensationalism.

−

  You inaccurately report about the note transactions with the Japanese companies and the so-called Ponzi scheme.

−

  You also inaccurately portray the nature of reason for the contempt proceedings. A witness came forward in 2012 who was a former officer inside the MCC in NY who has filed an affidavit in  court that he was told to hold Armstrong until he broke or fessed up to the charges. Armstrong was placed in the hole for 8 days to break him physically, mentally and spiritually. That led to the so-called scripted plea, which he was required to read verbatim as written by the DOJ. 

− −

  The write up on the cache of hidden coins is another fabrication. What is written there do3es not accurately  portray the real story.  Read the original  court documents, and not rely on more news paper reporting designed to sell papers.   You were also not present in  the court chambers as I was to hear what was actually told to the judge in Philadelphia.  The federal district court judge was told that the receiver may have an interest in those coins, which appeared out of nowhere 3 years after they were allegedly found. 		 

−

  So, any claim that we should stick to the original source is nonsense.

  If you wish to discuss this openly and honestly with me, I am happy to do so.
  Otherwise, I intend to push this matter into arbitration.