Misplaced Pages

User talk:Light current

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Light current (talk | contribs) at 01:56, 6 December 2006 (cut to arch). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 01:56, 6 December 2006 by Light current (talk | contribs) (cut to arch)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Please post new messages to the TOP of my talk page (but below this notice)

Greetings!

Always nice to have a stimulating but civil discussion!!

(People just wont believe me)!

Please use headlines when starting new topics -----------Thank you---------
Saying of the day: '****Blessed are the cracked: for it is they who let in the light**** 
--
Here's my edit count.

Archives

Enough

You've now made it clear that you're just looking for a response out of people with this latest comment. This is not a chat room. You appear to just be stirring up controversy just for the fun of it. Since this is an ongoing problem and you show no signs of getting it, I've blocked you for 1 week. If you wish to contribute usefully when the block expires, please do so. Friday (talk) 23:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Are you talking about this comment?

How do you know it was related to masturbation? THat interpretation is purely in your mind!--Light current 23:12, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

THats all I added.--Light current 00:21, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Of course that's the comment I'm talking about- it's the one I linked to. Friday (talk) 01:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
How can that warrant a block?--Light current 01:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
So Slim, what exactly did I get blocked for? Can you say?--Light current 01:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

RFC

It's been suggested at Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Light_current that a user conduct RFC may be appropriate in your case. However before going to the trouble (and, possibly, drama) I have some simple questions: Do you believe that a significant number of experienced editors find your conduct at the reference desks frequently inappropriate? Do you think this indicates that you ought to change that behavior? These are the points that an RFC would try to drive home- however if you already realize this, perhaps we can skip this step. If you don't believe that a significant number of experienced editors find your behavior inappropriate, would reading a page where more people said this help to convince you? If not, what would convince you? Do you understand why editors here should listen to the feedback they get from other editors? Friday (talk) 20:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Q:Do you believe that a significant number of editors find your conduct at the reference desks frequently inappropriate?
  • A:Yes I admit that. It is obviously true.
  • Q:Do you think this indicates that you ought to change that behavior?
  • A:Yes, I will try very hard not to upset anyone in future.
  • Q:Do you understand why editors here should listen to the feedback they get from other editors?
  • A: Yes we should all be responsive to representative feedback

I know this is going to sound a very weak argument, but truly, I am not trying to upset anyone. OK sometimes my 'jokes' may touch somebody's raw nerve I apologise for that. Sometimes someone may see things in my statements that I truly did not intend. I apologise for that. However, when answering as many questions as I do on the RDs Im bound to make a few errors of judgement now and again. I would ask my critics to look at the whole picture, not jst a few selected comments. I would be sad to have to leave the RDs becuase of a few misinterpretations of my posts and because they appear to have upset or offended some people. as I said before, everyone is different and some people may take offence where none at all was intended. I would therefore ask editors and readers to assume good fiath on my part. I am trying to help the RDs and WP in general as my records will show. I admit I have sometimes let my feelings get the better of me and i regret certain attack outbursts. I feel that is now under control. All Im trying to do is to make the RDs a happier place. Is that so wrong? 8-((--Light current 21:57, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

--Light current 21:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)



Slimey face tests

  • 8-| neutral
  • 8-? quizzical
  • 8-o surprised (or wearing goggles and respirator)
  • 8-) satisfied/happy
  • 8-)) very happy/laughing
  • 8-( unhappy
  • 8-(( very unhappy
  • 9-) joking (one eye winking)
  • 9-| sarcasm?
  • $:-( angry/frowning
  • $$:-(£) really angry
  • %-) only half awake/drunk/tipsy/
  • |-) blind drunk
  • |-| asleep

Wiki Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Light current, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --Ragib 06:41, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

mov bot msg to top

DONT PUT IT HERE PLEASE!!!!

DONT PUT IT HERE PUT IT AT THE TOP AS I REQUESTED

Diffs


Say...

Is this sort of snide remark really necessary? There are better, less smartass ways to communicate your disagreement with another editor's opinion.

If you have concerns about how the Ref Desk is being managed, its talk page is an appropriate forum for discussion. The talk page of the editor with whom you have a disagreement is also an excellent place to open a channel for communication.

Besides, it's perfectly reasonable to discuss viewpoints about the end of the world in a neutral, encyclopedic way. We have a number of good articles on this topic (see, for example, End of the world (philosophy), Eschatology, and End of planet Earth). Yours, TenOfAllTrades(talk) 01:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC)