Misplaced Pages

Jim Hoffman

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GreenIn2010 (talk | contribs) at 21:43, 15 November 2019 (Restoring core section on 9/11 work - having no content regarding the work of the person makes the page incoherent.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:43, 15 November 2019 by GreenIn2010 (talk | contribs) (Restoring core section on 9/11 work - having no content regarding the work of the person makes the page incoherent.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Jim Hoffman' is a website engineer in Oakland, California, who created several web sites about the September 11, 2001 attacks that analyze and suggest alternative accounts for the events of that day. His primary website, 9-11 Research, serves as an archive of documentation and alternative analyses about the attacks. Hoffman has also written numerous technical essays which focus on the World Trade Center controlled demolition hypothesis.

The Editor of Popular Mechanics, James B. Meigs, describes Hoffman as a "leading conspiracy theorist."

Background

Hoffman co-published a paper on "Computer graphics tools for the study of minimal surfaces".

September 11, 2001 attacks

Since early 2003, Hoffman has been writing about the collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) and other aspects of the September 11, 2001 attacks. His work has examined the collapse of the smaller 7 World Trade Center, and he is critical of the official explanation of that collapse. Hoffman has also written a critique of the official National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) report on the building collapses, a critique of the 2006 NIST FAQ, and critiques of articles about the 9/11 conspiracy theories by the popular-science magazines Scientific American and Popular Mechanics.

See also

References

  1. 9-11 Research: An Attempt to Uncover the Truth About September 11th, 2001. Retrieved May 10, 2014.
  2. Manjoo, Farhad (2006-06-27). "The 9/11 deniers". Feature. Salon.com, Inc. Retrieved 2006-08-21.
  3. Hoffman, Jim H. "Essays On Aluminothermics Use at the WTC". wtc7.net. Retrieved 2009-04-11.
  4. Meigs, James B. (2006). "The Conspiracy Industry". Popular Mechanics. Hearst Communications, Inc. Retrieved 2006-10-16.
  5. Computer graphics tools for the study of minimal surfaces, acm.org
  6. 9-11 Research - About Jim Hoffman
  7. 9-11 Research - The 9/11/01 Attack: Means, Motive, and Precedent
  8. 9-11 Research - Building a Better Mirage: NIST's 3-Year $20,000,000 Cover-Up of the Crime of the Century
  9. A Reply to the National Institute for Standards and Technology's 'Answers to Frequently Asked Questions'
  10. 9-11 Research - Scientific American's Dishonest Attack On 911Research
  11. 9-11 Research - Popular Mechanics Attacks Its "9/11 LIES" Straw Man

Publications

External links

9/11 conspiracy theories
Key topics
Groups
Film and TV
Books
Category
Categories: