This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bait30 (talk | contribs) at 00:34, 7 December 2019 (→Removed Content from Air Gendarmerie). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:34, 7 December 2019 by Bait30 (talk | contribs) (→Removed Content from Air Gendarmerie)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
Welcome!
|
New message from CASSIOPEIA
Hello, Bait30. You have new messages at WP:TH.Message added 08:02, 7 October 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
CASSIOPEIA 08:02, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luvuyo Memela, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Winger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
Hi Bait30! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Your thread has been archived
Hi Bait30! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Garza v. Idaho has been accepted
Garza v. Idaho, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!
Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:40, 24 October 2019 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: College Behind Bars has been accepted
College Behind Bars, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!
— Sagotreespirit () 21:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC)New message from Bait30
Hello, Bait30. You have new messages at Bait30's talk page.Message added 02:38, 1 December 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Bait30 02:38, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Removed Content from Air Gendarmerie
Hi Bait30. I am very new to editing on Misplaced Pages and did not realize I had to write my explanation along with my changes. Sorry about that and thank you. I removed a source and a sentence because I later learned that it is not appropriate to include primary sources. The sentence I removed is from primary source and thought it would be best to remove it to avoid bias. Please leave it in if you think it is alright otherwise feel free to remove it. Thanks again! Evillafr (talk) 00:09, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Evillafr: Thanks for the explanation! You should remove it yourself. I don't want to "steal" your edit. Just make sure to add an edit summary when you do. It can be something simple like "removed primary source" -- Bait30 00:34, 7 December 2019 (UTC)