This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Caltraser55 (talk | contribs) at 15:36, 19 December 2019 (→December 2019). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 15:36, 19 December 2019 by Caltraser55 (talk | contribs) (→December 2019)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome
Hello, Caltraser55, and Welcome to Misplaced Pages!Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
September 2018
Hello, I'm Newslinger. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Jordan Belfort, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 07:56, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
August 2019
Hello, I'm Kerry Raymond. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Brisbane, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Indeed, let's take it to Talk Kerry (talk) 00:39, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
September 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content, as you did at Second Cold War. Nick-D (talk) 07:17, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for violations of Misplaced Pages's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Nick-D (talk) 07:38, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- I note also the discussion at Talk:Second Cold War#Sino-Australian tension where concerns had been raised about your editing and this extraordinary talk page post where you accused someone of being " nothing more than a CCP censor agent" who was attempting to "silence" Australia and Hong Kong. As your BLP violations appear to be motivated by your personal political beliefs, I seriously considered setting the duration as indefinite due to a lack of confidence that they will not be repeated when the time expires. Nick-D (talk) 07:44, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- What can I say I am unapologetically pro-democracy, and yes George-Ho asked me to retract those statements to which I did, so that isn't an argument for blocking me. Nowhere did I post defamatory remarks about Gladys Liu on here.--Caltraser55 (talk) 07:48, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- Perhaps you are right then User:Nick-D, I honestly had no intention to defame, I was just adding content I thought was of interest to that section. You have my sincere apologies.--Caltraser55 (talk) 08:21, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- No answer Nick-D?
- As you retained the unblock request below where you're arguing that your reinsertion of this material was justified, I'm not sure what to make of this to be honest. I note that the block has now expired, and wish you the best in editing in accordance with WP:BLP in the future. Nick-D (talk) 08:39, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Caltraser55 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Unfairly blocked by User:Nick-D over what he believes were defamatory comments I made about Gladys Liu, when pressed on what comments he was referring to User:Nick-D ignored and continued removing valid content without prior discussion. I believe I was civil, as per his talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Nick-D#Second_Cold_War:_Sino-Australian_tension and I repeatedly told him I was open to constructive discussion and he was free to edit and add anything that he felt were "biased", however I did not feel removing the entire content was a warranted action, so I stand by my commitment as per https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Second_Cold_War&action=history to revert what I believed was unnecessary deletion of contentCaltraser55 (talk) 3:53 am, 14 September 2019, last Saturday (3 days ago) (UTC−4)
Decline reason:
Block has expired. N.J.A. | talk 13:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
December 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Misplaced Pages. Begoon 13:44, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- Your contributions at the Australia talk page have been correctly described as trolling. It would be the work of moments to demonstrate that this description applies to the majority of your contributions to date, including those for which you have already been blocked. Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia - those here to help build it are very welcome - those demonstrably here just to amuse themselves, not so much. If you want to continue editing here then I seriously recommend a change of approach, rather soon. I think this is good advice - you are, of course, free to ignore it, but that's not really a good idea, IMHO. -- Begoon 13:55, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- Um sorry blocked for what exactly? I made an edit, people disagreed and took it to discuss the edit, I made an input which pointed out the name of Australia is... Commonwealth, which it is. And you've blocked me for pointing that out?? --Caltraser55 (talk) 11:59, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- I haven't blocked you for anything. I can't do that. What I've tried to do is explain to you that if you keep making disruptive edits like "I made an input which pointed out the name of Australia is... Commonwealth, which it is" then you're very likely to be blocked, particularly if you don't stop when you're asked to. And you are very likely to be blocked for that kind of nonsense if you keep wasting other peoples' time. Wasting other peoples' time seems to be a large part of what you think you are going to be allowed to do here. It isn't.
Now, if you don't like me saying that, or you think you should just be allowed to keep posting whatever nonsense you like - well, I'm sorry - you can't, and you will be blocked if you carry on. HTH. Please take this warning seriously. -- Begoon 13:40, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- Calling someone a troll doesn't make them one, it's a way of shutting down discourse. I could say the exact same thing to you that you're threatening to me, and at least my edits are useful and cordial.--Caltraser55 (talk) 15:36, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- I haven't blocked you for anything. I can't do that. What I've tried to do is explain to you that if you keep making disruptive edits like "I made an input which pointed out the name of Australia is... Commonwealth, which it is" then you're very likely to be blocked, particularly if you don't stop when you're asked to. And you are very likely to be blocked for that kind of nonsense if you keep wasting other peoples' time. Wasting other peoples' time seems to be a large part of what you think you are going to be allowed to do here. It isn't.