This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 209.214.22.231 (talk) at 16:38, 11 December 2006 (→Derek Smart page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:38, 11 December 2006 by 209.214.22.231 (talk) (→Derek Smart page)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Jan06. Sections without timestamps are not archived |
User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Jun06
User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Jul06
User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Aug06
User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Sep06
User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Oct06
User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Nov06
User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Dec06
Controversial Derek Smart page
Hello there and thanks for your comment on the Derek Smart page. I can't seem to login to my account from work but I will send you an email shortly after my meeting. In the meantime, I notice that the page has been blocked from editing by new or anon users by the same admin who, IMO, improperly blocked a user (WarhawkSP) this morning. Obviously he put this block because he felt that he was being reprimanded or attacked for his action. What is going on with these guys? He reverts an edit that I did because I was anon. Point of fact: he never even checked what it was I had reverted, nor did he check the talk page. That Ars Technica excerpt is in gross violation of and WP:RS but one would think that he'd know that?
Another admin recently resigned for the same reason that I did. This behavior by some admins is completely unacceptable. And this action taken by Steel359 is an example of why Wiki is constantly coming under attack by critics and why pov-pushing editors can easily gain a consensus when all the other editors have either left or blocked. And don't bother reporting an abusive admin.
Anyway, can you help these guys out on that page? I can't login to my account until I get home from work. 209.214.22.231 16:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Your input is requested
Your input would be appreciated at this Request for Comments. Kelly Martin (talk) 17:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Aphrodisiac question
Hipocrite - just to let you know that I reinstated the "aphrodisiac" question that you deleted from the Miscellaneous RD. It's a weird question, but I don't think it deserves to be deleted on sight. Your comment said something about illegal medicial advice, but AFAIK aphrodisiacs are not illegal. If you wanted to tell the questioner that the Misplaced Pages RD is not the right place to come for medical advice, then it is better to post this as a response to the question - if the question is deleted, then the questioner may simply repeat it. Gandalf61 15:47, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, you were reading more into the question than I saw. Feel free to delete it again if you feel strongly - I won't revert. Gandalf61 16:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)