Misplaced Pages

User talk:QuackGuru

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 03:28, 31 January 2020 (Archiving 3 discussion(s) to User talk:QuackGuru/Archive 5) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 03:28, 31 January 2020 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 3 discussion(s) to User talk:QuackGuru/Archive 5) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) This user is taking a kit kat-break.

Check sources

www.scoop.it/t/the-future-of-e-cigarette

http://www.economist.com/topics/electronic-cigarettes

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/electronic-cigarettes/

http://www.tobacco.org/

Nomination of Media reports of persons hospitalized involving the 2019 vaping lung illness outbreak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Media reports of persons hospitalized involving the 2019 vaping lung illness outbreak is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Media reports of persons hospitalized involving the 2019 vaping lung illness outbreak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beland (talk) 22:20, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Signature color and user page redirect

I didn't want to clutter up the article talk page where I first suggested redirecting your user page to your talk page.

I just realized that you want your user name to be red in signatures. I hadn't bothered to analyze the wikitext until now:

] (])
QuackGuru (talk)

And I learned a trick for combining bolding and color styling: <b style="color: #e34234;">Text</b>

Text

I will be using that. It is more compact than using span.

You can make it easier for people if you redirect your user page to your talk page. It won't effect the color of your username in signatures since you are using inline styling.

You know, you could make your signature username a color like orange. That would be a bright color, but it wouldn't confuse people by being a red link.

]
QuackGuru

-- Timeshifter (talk) 18:16, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

List of brands on Nicotine pouch

You reverted my edit on Nicotine pouch in which I deleted the content about the various brands of this product, with the edit summary Including brands are part of the article. See Heat-not-burn product#Products. (If it is an invitation for spam then request semi-protection. I would argue that the inclusion of the individual products in that article is no more appropriate than the inclusion in Nicotine pouch. Since Misplaced Pages is not an indiscriminate collection of information, including an exhaustive brand listing within the body of the article seems inappropriate. At very best, one might consider creating List of nicotine pouch brands, but since the product category is relatively new, it's unlikely any of the brands has yet reached sufficient notability to have its own article, and since most lists should consist only of category entries that already have a Misplaced Pages article (see WP:WTAF), you'd be hard-pressed to create a valid list article. In any case, since you've reverted my edit, I'll open a discussion about the matter at Talk:Nicotine pouch. Please feel free to comment there. WikiDan61ReadMe!! 19:28, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Violation of RfC

Re: this edit where your edit summary was simply Violation of RfC. Care to explain? WikiDan61ReadMe!! 19:57, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

I started numerous RfCs last year. Read archive 10 under brands. QuackGuru (talk) 20:05, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Category: