Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bradv (talk | contribs) at 15:36, 5 March 2020 (manually archiving). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article was nominated for deletion on 21 November 2005. The result of the discussion was keep.
Changing Pakistan claims
Hagennos Please discuss your edits here. You have changed the wording in some of text which was clearly stated as Pakistani claims to stating them as facts. Now those sentences itself required citation to be there by changing the wording you are also changing the meaning of the sentence. Please explain yourself here and maintain WP:STATUSQUO. Adamgerber80 (talk) 18:44, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
@Adamgerber80: How do you think the meaning was changed. See the edits here
Original Text
It was aimed at luring the heavy ships anchored in Bombay into attacking the Pakistani ships. The intention was that the submarine PNS Ghazi lurking in the Arabian Sea would then engage and sink the Indian ships.
Changed Text
It was aimed at luring the heavy ships anchored in Bombay into attacking the Pakistani shipsto enable the submarine PNS Ghazi lurking in the Arabian Sea to engage and sink the Indian ships.
When you already have the statement "It was aimed at luring " then why should we have another sentence starting with "The intention was"
Changed Text
As per Pakistani sources, the objective to divert the Indian Air Force from attacking Pakistan's southern front worked as the Indian Air Force raids on the city of Karachi ceased, presumed to be due to lack of availability of the radar guidance, which was damaged in the attack.
Original Text
As per Pakistani sources, objective to divert the Indian Air Force attacking Pakistan's southern front worked as the Indian Air Force raids on the city of Karachi ceased, presumed by Pakistani sources to be due to lack of availability of the radar guidance to the IAF fighter jets, which was damaged according to Pakistani claims in the attack
When we already have the statement starting with "As per Pakistani sources" then why we need to keep emphasizing it three times in a same sentence? --Hagennos19:08, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Hagennos Okay. I am going to self revert but split out that sentence since since it is too long and convoluted that in my view it conveys that as the neutral stance. Adamgerber80 (talk) 13:22, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Referencing and citation: criterion met
_without_national_boundaries.svg)
