This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GargAvinash (talk | contribs) at 06:24, 4 May 2020 (Re). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:24, 4 May 2020 by GargAvinash (talk | contribs) (Re)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)- Q. @Rosguill: Did I do a mistake in this edit? It says about someone had intricate links with a political party! — GargAvinash 18:21, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- @GargAvinash:, that looks like a gray area to me. On the one hand, from reviewing past discussions cited at WP:NPPSG, there's no consensus on whether or not The Quint and The Wire are reliable. That having been said, claims of funding don't seem particularly controversial, and I'm not sure it's necessary to couch them in attribution, which is usually reserved for analysis and/or disputed claims. Is there any reason to believe that these sources' claims of funding are inaccurate? signed, Rosguill 18:27, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Rosguill: These two sources seems only to cover about funding. — GargAvinash 07:35, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- @GargAvinash:, that looks like a gray area to me. On the one hand, from reviewing past discussions cited at WP:NPPSG, there's no consensus on whether or not The Quint and The Wire are reliable. That having been said, claims of funding don't seem particularly controversial, and I'm not sure it's necessary to couch them in attribution, which is usually reserved for analysis and/or disputed claims. Is there any reason to believe that these sources' claims of funding are inaccurate? signed, Rosguill 18:27, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- I sometimes think that it can be a serious issue. I was blocked from editing on two accounts. Appealed for unblock many times but none was ready to unblock me (I seriously don't know why). Should I declare that this account also belongs to the same person? Albeit my edit history is good but I think I will be blocked again for the reason of sockpuppetry. — GargAvinash 17:59, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- GargAavinash could you clarify what these accounts were? Generally blocked editors are able to rejoin under the standard offer, but it really depends on the original circumstances of the block. signed, Rosguill 19:29, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Rosguill: Accounts are Kumargargavinash and ADPS. If community will not block the current account then we will continue at NPP School. — GargAvinash 06:24, 4 May 2020 (UTC)