This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Thucydides411 (talk | contribs) at 21:43, 28 May 2020 (→Shi Zhengli: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:43, 28 May 2020 by Thucydides411 (talk | contribs) (→Shi Zhengli: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)May 2020
Hello, I'm Subwaymuncher. I noticed that you recently removed content from Beware of a Holy Whore without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - SUBWAY 16:22, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Notice of general sanctions for CoVID-19 related articles
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.Please carefully read this information:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.
Template:Z33 -Thucydides411 (talk) 21:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Shi Zhengli
You've now added the same material to the WP:BLP Shi Zhengli three times: . This material is poorly sourced, presented in a highly WP:POV manner, and I believe that it violates Misplaced Pages's policies governing biographies of living persons, for which special attention to neutrality and weight must be paid.
As an article that is closely related to CoVID-19, Shi Zhengli falls under the general sanctions WP:GS/COVID19. That means that the following guidelines apply to the page:
Sources for any content related to medical aspects of the disease are expected to adhere to the standards laid down at WP:MEDRS. Since this is a rapidly evolving area with instances already documented of poor or fraudulent research, preprints and other non-peer-reviewed sources should not be used.
Editors are reminded that the onus is on the editor seeking to include disputed content to achieve consensus for its inclusion. Any content or source removed in good faith and citing a credible policy-based rationale should not be reinstated without prior consensus on the article's talk page.
By adding the same material in repeatedly, without establishing consensus on the talk page, you have violated the second of these guidelines. Your edits are also not based on WP:MEDRS sources, which violates the first guideline. Please revert your own edit, and then discuss on the talk page. -Thucydides411 (talk) 21:43, 28 May 2020 (UTC)