This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Viking~enwiki (talk | contribs) at 13:08, 30 May 2003 (a short answer to your "nonsense" comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:08, 30 May 2003 by Viking~enwiki (talk | contribs) (a short answer to your "nonsense" comment)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Regarding Anal sex, where does the pornography law you refer to apply? I don't think that you should be editing articles to make them comply with local laws. Should people in Iran come in an edit all the articles so that they fit their laws? We wouldn't have much of a Wiki left if they did, would we? CGS 12:42 30 May 2003 (UTC).
- To answer your question: Pornography law of the United States of America, such content like within fisting or rimming or Anal sex might endanger the whole survival of wikipedia, which is standing on relatively weak feet (just remember how fast Larry died, and you do need a host and somebody to carry the expenses and responsibilities - like it or not - you should at least become a sysop before critcizing others in such a way) - if you are interested and capable: read the German or Dutch sites of our project, those correspond to the laws (which is much more liberal, even in Germany)
- Viking 12:52 30 May 2003 (UTC)
- Dude. This "become a sysop before you dare question me" nonsense has got to stop. Evercat 13:01 30 May 2003 (UTC)
- Evercat, your statement
- "Hi. I'm Allan Crossman, philosophy graduate from Edinburgh, currently employed in a library. I'm also the webmaster of the British Go Association - see the entry on Go."
- is hard to understand - you are invited too Viking 13:07 30 May 2003 (UTC)