Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ItsKesha (talk | contribs) at 17:42, 29 September 2020 (Undid revision 980982542 by JIMBOB8 (talk) "stop getting Rash wrong"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

September 2020

Your recent editing history at Kelly Clarkson shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Deor (talk) 02:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:JIMBOB8 reported by User:Tbhotch (Result: ). Thank you. © Tbhotch 17:47, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Lay Me Down (Sam Smith song). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Czello 19:19, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

@JIMBOB8: I have partially blocked you from articles specifically in the hopes you will use this opportunity to talk out what you are edit warring. I would encourage you to participate in the WP:ANEW discussion linked above. If you do not communicate and continue to edit war in this fashion after the block expires, I will have to consider blocking you indefinitely on the grounds that competence is required, and willingness to discuss is a core component of Misplaced Pages competence. Red Phoenix 19:36, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Om Puri—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 14:40, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Misplaced Pages without adequate explanation, as you did at Andreas Christensen, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi, can you stop repeatedly reverting edits without explanation as you did on Marcus Rashford? Thanks ItsKesha (talk) 10:03, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Marcus Rashford shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Czello 15:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)