Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Grenavitar (talk | contribs) at 07:58, 3 January 2007 (Muhammad image). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Faith Freedom International

Yes, that is exactly what I meant. Please do keep watching for the edit warriors on this article, your creating it provides a magnet for every kind of POV warrior, but the way to start was exactly like this, with evidence of multiple non-trivial coverage in reliable secondary sources. I will make Ali Sina a redirect. Guy (Help!) 21:27, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Faith Freedom

Great job there. Arrow740 04:56, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Your vote

Would you please care to explain why you voted against my steward election. All you've done is link to a User Talk page in which I am being insulted and my views and actions misrepresented. Bastiq▼e 20:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

I have replied on the relevant Meta-Wiki page. -- Karl Meier 22:37, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Islamophobia

Hi Karl, I see you've been working on the Islamophobia article. IF you have the time (and the inclination) you might want to write something about the new EU report that was just released. I'm going to try to read it soon but I haven't had the time. jaco♫plane 17:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

I've now done some significant restructuring, rationalising and generally cleaning up of this article. It needs more, but I have you will approve of the direction in which I've taken it. I believe it is now a much better base for us to work on. Metamagician3000 11:36, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Your recent request for checkuser

You recently compiled and listed a case at requests for checkuser. A checkuser or clerk has requested you supply one or more diffs to justify the use of the checkuser procedure in the case, in accordance with the procedures listed in the table at the top of the requests for checkuser page. For an outcome to be achieved, we require that you provide these diffs as soon as possible. This has been implemented to reduce difficulties for checkusers, and is essential for your case to be processed. A link to your recently-created case which has this information missing is here. Thanks for your co-operation. Daniel.Bryant 05:59, 1 January 2007 (UTC), checkuser clerk.

WP:RPA

refactoring should be done by an independant party. refactoring possible "personal attacks" against oneself involves a conflict of interests. if we were all to do that, i imagine we would be refactoring eachother's comments excessively and unnecessarily. i personally don't see the comment as much of a personal attack. ITAQALLAH 16:24, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

i don't think he was or would accuse you of that, he was simply saying "don't bite my head off." i feel you are overstating the evidence. ITAQALLAH 16:36, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Muhammad image

I just want to make sure you understand my point from Talk:Muhammad. An image needs to be more than informational. Ahmadi beliefs are part of Islam--but they don't deserve much if any discussion on Islam. Similarly you must argue that depictions of Muhammad are important enough to belong on his main page. This is not obvious because the tradition of depicting him is not nearly as important as calligraphy or aniconism. This isn't censorship for Muslims--this is representing tradition--which is the important thing. I just want to you start arguing for why images are important enough to belong--providing information is not a justification--since this provides information about Muhammad's legacy--but obviously doesn't belong on his page. gren グレン 07:58, 3 January 2007 (UTC)